2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1275354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Footprint with Resistance Exercise

Abstract: We aimed to describe the changes in footprint characteristics after 2 types of resistance training sessions performed at different intensities. 18 young subjects (8 men and 10 women) volunteered for the study. All of them performed 2 different resistance training sessions, one with light loads (LS) and the other with heavy loads (HS). Their footprint was recorded and analysed before and after exercise. Lengths, widths, and areas of the footprint (rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot) were measured. Almost all the v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By definition, the volunteers with various degrees of MLA were classified according to the protocol designed by Cavanagh and Rodgers [ 22 ] related to index arch, in agreement with previous studies that have analyzed these factors to show standard assessment of this condition and contributed to medical diagnostic and medical treatment of the foot problems [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…By definition, the volunteers with various degrees of MLA were classified according to the protocol designed by Cavanagh and Rodgers [ 22 ] related to index arch, in agreement with previous studies that have analyzed these factors to show standard assessment of this condition and contributed to medical diagnostic and medical treatment of the foot problems [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Dentro de las limitaciones de este estudio, se encuentra el hecho que el baropodoscopio empleado no diferenciaba entre las presiones plantares registradas en las distintas zonas del pie, lo cual no permite evaluar estos resultados en comparación con otros autores que encuentran aumento de los valores de presión plantar en zonas específicas, tales como la región del antepié (Szulc et al, 2017). Asimismo, se observa que una buena cantidad de estudios han utilizado plantillas instrumentadas, equipamiento que puede diferir en los resultados que se obtienen en una plataforma (Chevalier, Hodgins, & Chockalingam, 2010) La variable AI, que a través del análisis de las áreas de apoyo plantar permite determinar la constitución del APLM y a su vez clasificar los pies en planos, normales y cavos, sólo mostró diferencias significativas entre el pre y post test dentro del pie no dominante en GD, con tendencia hacia el aplanamiento de la bóveda plantar, tal como lo planteado por Tsung y colaboradores (Tsung et al, 2003) y Jiménez y colaboradores (Jimenez-Ormeño et al, 2011). Un estudio similar realizado en carrera, es el hecho por Maslon y colaboradores (Maslon, Golec, Szczygiel, Czechowska, & Golec, 2016), quienes encontraron que los corredores aplanan más la bóveda plantar, como un mecanismo de amortiguación activa de fuerzas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Before making the measurements, every subject rested for 10 min in supine position so as not to alter the foot's postural dynamics (Jimenez-Ormeño et al, 2011). Then the body weight and height were measured and the plantar support was evaluated dynamically (Baseline).…”
Section: Acute Effect Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%