2022
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in foraging behaviour suggest competition between wild and domestic ungulates: Guanaco and domestic sheep in southern Patagonia

Abstract: Previous attempts to address the presence of interspecific competition between domestic livestock and wild ungulates have focused largely on habitat or dietary overlaps. Although overlaps in habitat or diet create opportunities for competition to occur between species, competition only results from such overlap if it affects one or both species negatively. Less attention has been afforded to possible behavioural modifications induced in wildlife by competition with domestic livestock. Here, we investigated the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All statistical analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Team 2022). To investigate the effect of puma sex and season on the probability of different species and size categories being preyed upon, the data were analyzed in Bayesian hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models (e.g., Koster and McElreath 2017, dos Anjos et al 2022, Lancaster et al 2022). The effect of puma sex and season were assessed on prey species and prey size categories separately.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All statistical analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Team 2022). To investigate the effect of puma sex and season on the probability of different species and size categories being preyed upon, the data were analyzed in Bayesian hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models (e.g., Koster and McElreath 2017, dos Anjos et al 2022, Lancaster et al 2022). The effect of puma sex and season were assessed on prey species and prey size categories separately.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals adjust their foraging behaviour to cope with fluctuations in the availability of trophic resources (Owen‐Smith, 2008), which in turn greatly influences individual (e.g., fitness; Trevail et al., 2019), population (e.g., survival rate; Boff et al., 2021), community (e.g., competition; Lancaster et al., 2022), and ecosystem (e.g., energy pathways; McMeans et al., 2016) processes. According to Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT), these fluctuations drive important variations in the diversity of resources used at individual and population levels (i.e., within‐individual and total niche widths, respectively; Pyke, 1984; Roughgarden, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%