2009
DOI: 10.1080/01463370903313430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Friendship Commitment: Comparing Geographically Close and Long-Distance Young-Adult Friendships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though none of the items in the dependent variable explicitly required geographic proximity, the physical distance between dyad members was negatively correlated with resource access; that is, as t he distance between two people increased, perceived access to resources decreased, even after controlling for relational closeness. Previous research looking at relationship maintenance found little to no difference in relational closeness between geographically proximate and distant connections [69,70]; that said, there is a difference between keeping in touch and exchanging meaningful resources. Furthermore, physical proximity facilitates access to more instrumental resources, such as going to a baseball game together or helping a friend move.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Even though none of the items in the dependent variable explicitly required geographic proximity, the physical distance between dyad members was negatively correlated with resource access; that is, as t he distance between two people increased, perceived access to resources decreased, even after controlling for relational closeness. Previous research looking at relationship maintenance found little to no difference in relational closeness between geographically proximate and distant connections [69,70]; that said, there is a difference between keeping in touch and exchanging meaningful resources. Furthermore, physical proximity facilitates access to more instrumental resources, such as going to a baseball game together or helping a friend move.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…70 Humans remember and also maintain friendships despite long periods of separation; young adults living long distances apart remain friends for 8 years or more. 71 People also tend to be over-inclusive when differentiating kin from nonkin. These false-positive kin-recognition errors (i.e., treating nonkin as kin) appear to be more prominent in women than men, the latter of which may suffer higher costs from forming alliances with nonrelatives.…”
Section: Recognizing Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has established positive correlations between use of CMC in long-distance relationships and increased levels of love and intimacy [20] and trust [8]. More recent research by Johnson and colleagues [27] found similarities in how geographically close and long-distance friends defined closeness, with a focus on "self-disclosure" and "help and support," both of which can be provided through CMC (as opposed to other resources that may require physical proximity). 1 See Method section for details regarding how participants selected the Friend they rated in the study.…”
Section: Technology's Role In Relationship Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%