Younger men were more likely to report having a monogamous partnership, but they were also less likely to report condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) with their PRP. In multivariate analysis of partnership arrangements, having a non-monogamous partnership with their PRP was associated with being older (AOR=1.03; 95%CI=1.02-1.04; p<0.001). Nearly two thirds (62.9%) of men with monogamous partnerships had a clear spoken agreement with their PRP about whether they could have sex with other men, largely regardless of age. While slightly fewer than half the men with selfdescribed open partnerships (46.0%) actually described it as a 'relationship', younger men were particularly less likely to do so. Conclusions: Due to less communication with partners about sexual agreements, when young gay men engage in sexual risk behaviour they may beat an increased risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
3
IntroductionAge has been identified as a key factor in HIV infection among gay men internationally, and young men have been identified as being at increased risk (1,2).Also, it has been estimated that up to two thirds of new infections among gay men occurred in the context of a partnership with a 'primary' or 'regular partner ' (3,4), although this proportion has been lower in Australia with 30-40% of new infections having been reported as due to sex with a regular partner (5,6). Given this context, does age affect how gay men communicate within their part partnerships? Gay men's partnerships have been a traditional focus for HIV prevention efforts. Most condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) between gay men occurs with a primary partner (92.6%), although it is likely that much of it represents minimal risk for HIV transmission (7). Negotiated safety agreements within gay men's partnerships have been key to HIV prevention in Australia for nearly twenty years (8) and have been found to be an effective HIV prevention strategy (9). The negotiation of risk is a complex and dynamic process that is mediated by a number of individual factors including knowledge, beliefs and emotions. Partnerships, regardless of their length or form, are the social unit within which much negotiation about risk occurs.Communication between primary partners is critical to the effective negotiation of risk by gay men (10) In negotiated safety agreements between seroconcordant HIV negative men in a primary partnership, CLAI is permitted within the partnership but not outside of the primary partnership (11). To be effective, such agreements require clear communication of HIV status, testing history, and sexual history.It has been argued that gay men are less constrained by societal and familial pressures to conform to a particular, usually monogamous, partnership configuration (12).Discussion about sexual non-exclusivity within gay partnerships is common and often 4 openly discussed between couples (10). Nonetheless, for many gay men, monogamy forms the basis of a secure and satisfying partnership, and within which condom use often is eliminated bas...