2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in hafted biface resharpening during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene in the central and southeastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in small parts of the point shape are somewhat predictive of overall point shape change. Contrast this with a Paleoindian Dalton point, in which the size and shape of the haft is not predictive of blade size and shape [ 58 , 128 , 129 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in small parts of the point shape are somewhat predictive of overall point shape change. Contrast this with a Paleoindian Dalton point, in which the size and shape of the haft is not predictive of blade size and shape [ 58 , 128 , 129 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of allometry is generally well-accepted in the analysis of chipped stone points and other tool types [ 56 :82–83 and references cited therein] and probably accepted intuitively by most analysts [ 57 , 58 ], but modularity and integration are rarely discussed. Allometry is manifested as the tool is reduced in size during repair, resharpening, or refurbishing to satisfy a different function.…”
Section: Incidence Of Allometry Modularity and Integration In Archaeo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more attention has been given to explaining why Paleoindians fluted points, some have considered why fluting was abandoned. Newby and colleagues (2005; also see Williams and Niquette 2019) link point chronologies to environmental changes, suggesting that fluting was tied to hunting large game at the end of the Pleistocene. However, Buchanan and colleagues (2011) have since questioned the proposed link between point form and prey size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%