2014
DOI: 10.1086/677160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Healthcare-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections after the Introduction of a National Hand Hygiene Initiative

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Cambridge University Press andThe Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Infection Control and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the high number of enrolled wards not performing HAI surveillance, implementing infection surveillance to evaluate the impact of the campaign on patient outcomes for the duration of the study or using available surveillance data from a proportion of wards only was considered unfeasible and potentially inaccurate. However, a large number of other studies have explored the link between hand hygiene and infection rates [1] and investigators continue to add positive evidence [27-30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high number of enrolled wards not performing HAI surveillance, implementing infection surveillance to evaluate the impact of the campaign on patient outcomes for the duration of the study or using available surveillance data from a proportion of wards only was considered unfeasible and potentially inaccurate. However, a large number of other studies have explored the link between hand hygiene and infection rates [1] and investigators continue to add positive evidence [27-30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Hände des Personals werden bei Maßnahmen am Patienten sowie bei Kontakt mit der unmittelbaren Patientenumgebung mit potentiell pathogenen Erregern kontaminiert [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] [95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102]. Ebenso ist die Effizienz der Hände-desinfektion bei der Beherrschung von Ausbrüchen nachgewiesen [103][104][105][106].…”
Section: Die Hygienische Händedesinfektionunclassified
“…Reductions in risk of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia from the introduction of the national initiative were estimated using 2,304 monthly infection rates across 38 hospitals in six states and territories. A brief summary is provided and a complete description of the statistical method and results are available [ 35 ]. There was variability in the start date among sites, Appendix C in S1 File .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%