1990
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.74.6.359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in height of choroidal melanomas after plaque therapy.

Abstract: In the only other series that has been similarly analysed Coleman et al (New York) reported that tumour thickness was not a significant predictor of percentage reduction in height. However, they showed that ultrasonically derived spectral parameters did correlate with regression.3 At six months they found that acoustic tissue type (ATT) B had a 29-5% reduction in height, while ATT E had an 11-4% reduction in height. At 18 months ATT B had a 53 9% reduction in height, while ATT E had a 26-4% reduction in height. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flattening of the tumour depended on the initial tumour thickness, as was also observed after plaque radiotherapy as sole treatment. 11 The mean time to development of a flat scar was statistically significant faster in tumours (3 mm compared to tumours .3 mm (Fig 1). The cut off at 3 mm was chosen because the mean tumour thickness reduction 3 months after combined TTT and plaque radiotherapy was 3.0 mm, as reported by Oosterhuis et al 6 That thicker melanomas continued to flatten during the 5 year follow up may be due to the late effect of plaque radiotherapy, whereby cell damage progresses slowly and continues for several years, whereas TTT induced tumour necrosis and vascular occlusion results in tumour regression within several months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Flattening of the tumour depended on the initial tumour thickness, as was also observed after plaque radiotherapy as sole treatment. 11 The mean time to development of a flat scar was statistically significant faster in tumours (3 mm compared to tumours .3 mm (Fig 1). The cut off at 3 mm was chosen because the mean tumour thickness reduction 3 months after combined TTT and plaque radiotherapy was 3.0 mm, as reported by Oosterhuis et al 6 That thicker melanomas continued to flatten during the 5 year follow up may be due to the late effect of plaque radiotherapy, whereby cell damage progresses slowly and continues for several years, whereas TTT induced tumour necrosis and vascular occlusion results in tumour regression within several months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recurrence or unresponsiveness following plaque brachytherapy may indicate failure of local tumor control. Abramson et al25 showed a 12% tumor reduction (88% residual tumor burden) at 6 months following plaque brachytherapy, which increased to a 24% reduction (76% residual tumor burden) at 12 months. Following combined treatment with I-125 plaque brachytherapy and intravitreal bevacizumab, there was a significant decrease in tumor burden at all time points compared with baseline ( P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor burden with brachytherapy alone (Abramson et al25) compared with combined treatment with plaque brachytherapy and intravitreal bevacizumab.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because increase in tumor size could reflect continued cellular proliferation, it is usually an indication of treatment failure. 4,5 Other causes for tumor enlargement can occur, however, including hemorrhage or inflammation. Eyes studied histologically after brachytherapy exhibit prominent tumor vessels with signs of vascular damage when compared with choroidal melanomas treated with primary enucleation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study, treatment failure was defined as an increase in height of 15% or 250-mm expansion of any boundary, measured twice in 2 separate examinations. 5 We report a patient whose choroidal melanoma showed significant enlargement 15 years after brachytherapy. When examined histologically, the tumor had changed in size because of markedly dilated vessels (cavernous hemangiomalike) without evidence of renewed neoplastic proliferation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%