2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in knee joint line orientation after high tibial osteotomy are the result of adaptation of the lower limb to the new alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the mechanical axis from hip to ankle does not change, then a valgising high tibial osteotomy will lead to femoral adduction and, hence, a more lateral JLO. 7 However, these comments are not supported by data on the effects of specific tissue contact pressures on long-term degeneration that would validate clinical recommendations. It is desirable that long-term level 1 studies of osteotomy are conducted and that among many important factors, JLO should be measured to ascertain the clinical effect of this variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mechanical axis from hip to ankle does not change, then a valgising high tibial osteotomy will lead to femoral adduction and, hence, a more lateral JLO. 7 However, these comments are not supported by data on the effects of specific tissue contact pressures on long-term degeneration that would validate clinical recommendations. It is desirable that long-term level 1 studies of osteotomy are conducted and that among many important factors, JLO should be measured to ascertain the clinical effect of this variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies supporting the negative effect of excessive JLO on outcomes and survivorship did not exclude overcorrected valgus knees or they omitted regression analyses, raising the question of whether these patients performed poorly because of the excessive JLO or the excessive valgus correction. We can also speculate regarding some other factors potentially affecting the outcomes: first, the ankle and subtalar joints could be responsible for some degrees of compensation in case of JLO, but this aspect is still poorly understood 5 ; second, in all studies, including the present one, the JLO evaluation is performed in a static manner, and the role of an oblique joint line during gait is still unclear. In the present study, we tried to avoid some of the limitations described earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, the position of the lower-limb mechanical axis had a significant impact on the Tinetti assessment score, the VAS score, and the KSS score of the patients. Adjustment of the lower-limb mechanical axis to the lateral side in patients with osteoarthritis combined with varus deformity in the knee helped to shift the pressure of the knee joint to the lateral compartment; thus achieving the purpose of the treatment [ 20 , 21 ]. If the degree of adjustment of the lower-limb mechanical axis to the lateral side was under-correction, the pressure load of the medial compartment would not be fully relieved, and the postoperative pain and the postoperative knee joint function of the patients would not achieve satisfactory results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%