2009
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Lateral Abdominal Muscle Thickness During the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver in Those With Lumbopelvic Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
71
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
71
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple papers report the lateral symmetry of abdominals (both rectus and oblique) [41,42]. However our analyses revealed that the relationship of male gender with thickness in the right oblique area was found to be significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Multiple papers report the lateral symmetry of abdominals (both rectus and oblique) [41,42]. However our analyses revealed that the relationship of male gender with thickness in the right oblique area was found to be significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…[10][11][12] The ASLR has established reliability and validity data in women with posterior pelvic pain associated with pregnancy, 10 and has also been reported as a useful test for unilateral lumbopelvic pain. 24 Mens and colleagues 10 found the ASLR to have higher intrarater reliability than the AHAbd test, with an ICC 1,1 of 0.83. For the BKFO test, the patient is positioned in supine, with 1 lower extremity flexed with the foot on the table, and is asked to externally rotate and abduct the flexed limb as far as possible without rotating the pelvis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,37,69,70,72 For example, Teyhen et al 70 monitored the thickness of the IO and TrA muscles in 15 participants with unilateral lumbopelvic pain and 15 agematched and gender-matched controls, during the performance of an active straight leg raise test. They reported a 24% and 11% increase in TrA and IO thickness, respectively, in the control group, and significantly smaller (6% and 6%, respectively) increases in thickness in the lumbopelvic pain group.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Patient and Healthy Populations With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, for reasons explained above, it would be inappropriate to assume that the smaller change in thickness in the lumbopelvic pain cohort was due solely to a decreased amount of muscle activity, knowing that a 24% and an 11% change in thickness of the TrA and IO, respectively, is expected during an active straight leg raise test is potentially useful. In addition to this example and in keeping with the abdominal wall muscles as an example, investigators have measured thickness, length, and/or CSA in both resting 7,12,54,59,63 and dynamic conditions (eg, abdominal drawing-in maneuver, 11,69 respiration, 1,72 balance, upper limb tasks, 51 and walking tasks) within various (low back, lumbopelvic, and pelvic girdle pain, 67 amputees, 62 postpartum, 8 and healthy) cohorts. These studies provide normal resting values and/or describe patterns of architectural change.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Patient and Healthy Populations With mentioning
confidence: 99%