2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in low levels of lead over the course of pregnancy and the association with birth outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed additional analyses by using third trimester or mean (from third and second trimester) maternal BLL in our linear regression models but our findings were unchanged as compared to when we used second trimester BLL (Tables S1 and S2; Supplementary Material). Rabito et al measured maternal BLL in the first, second, and third trimester and found that second trimester is possibly the most critical window for the association between prenatal lead exposure and birthweight (Rabito et al 2014). Last, to ensure our findings were robust by using second trimester BMI instead of pre-pregnancy BMI, we performed additional sensitivity analysis which showed no changes in the β coefficient when we used pre-pregnancy BMI (β=−0.06, 95% CI: −0.13, 0.001; P =0.05), as compared to when we used second trimester BMI (β=−0.06, 95% CI: −0.13, 0.003; P =0.06) (Table S3; Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed additional analyses by using third trimester or mean (from third and second trimester) maternal BLL in our linear regression models but our findings were unchanged as compared to when we used second trimester BLL (Tables S1 and S2; Supplementary Material). Rabito et al measured maternal BLL in the first, second, and third trimester and found that second trimester is possibly the most critical window for the association between prenatal lead exposure and birthweight (Rabito et al 2014). Last, to ensure our findings were robust by using second trimester BMI instead of pre-pregnancy BMI, we performed additional sensitivity analysis which showed no changes in the β coefficient when we used pre-pregnancy BMI (β=−0.06, 95% CI: −0.13, 0.001; P =0.05), as compared to when we used second trimester BMI (β=−0.06, 95% CI: −0.13, 0.003; P =0.06) (Table S3; Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been suggested, however, for Pb concentrations <10 µg/dl the deficit in birth weight per 1 µg/dl increase in B-Pb is greater at lower than at higher concentrations, without evidence of a lower threshold of effect [ 9 ]. This is of importance given the high prevalence of low level B-Pb exposure among pregnant women in developed countries [ 10 13 ] and the controversy regarding the recommended level of concern for maternal B-Pb [ 8 ]. We have previously shown adverse effects of increased maternal B-Pb concentrations on birth outcomes, including birth weight, head circumference and crown–heel length, in a large cohort of pregnant women in the UK (the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, ALSPAC) using adjusted linear and logistic regression models [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reference dose has not been established by the EPA, because health effects may be caused with BBL at incredibly low levels (IRIS, 2004). Since the CDC also declared that there may not be a threshold below which lead exposure may be acceptable, Rabito et al (2014) tested a cohort of pregnant women with average blood lead levels under 1 µg/dL. Their results demonstrated a significant rise in material BLL from the second trimester to delivery.…”
Section: Children's Blood Lead Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%