2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01956.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in a medium‐sized river following a breach of a low‐head dam

Abstract: 1. Dam removal has great potential for restoring rivers and streams, yet limited data exist documenting recovery of associated biota within these systems following removals, especially on larger systems. This study examined the effects of a dam breach on benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in the Fox River, Illinois, U.S.A. 2. Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish were collected above and below the breached dam and three nearby intact dams for 1 year pre-and 3 years post-breach (2 years of additional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
73
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For eurytopic and rheophilic species, the availability of sheltered diversified habitats with a diverse food supply is essential as nursery and feeding grounds (Karr & Dudley, 1981). A decrease of natural river systems or habitat diversity will therefore be reflected by an impoverished fish diversity (Brooks et al, 2004;Sindilariu et al, 2006;Lester & Boulton, 2008) or native species richness (Koel, 2004;Tales & Berrebi, 2007) often related to the decline of rheophilic species (Kruk, 2007;Maloney et al, 2008;Slawski et al, 2008). The presence of these structures is therefore crucial in homogenous reaches but structures are different and vary markedly Fig.…”
Section: Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For eurytopic and rheophilic species, the availability of sheltered diversified habitats with a diverse food supply is essential as nursery and feeding grounds (Karr & Dudley, 1981). A decrease of natural river systems or habitat diversity will therefore be reflected by an impoverished fish diversity (Brooks et al, 2004;Sindilariu et al, 2006;Lester & Boulton, 2008) or native species richness (Koel, 2004;Tales & Berrebi, 2007) often related to the decline of rheophilic species (Kruk, 2007;Maloney et al, 2008;Slawski et al, 2008). The presence of these structures is therefore crucial in homogenous reaches but structures are different and vary markedly Fig.…”
Section: Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, the effects of dam removal are two-fold, in terms of the initial effects on the physical structure of the river (pulse disturbance; Tullos, Finn & Walter, 2014; Dorobek, Sullivan & Kautza, 2015; Gartner, Magilligan & Renshaw, 2015) and the reestablished seasonal disturbances from high flows over longer timescales (press or ramp disturbance; e.g., Maloney et al, 2008). Despite evidence that dam removal effects can occur at both short and longer time scales, few studies have examined the trajectory of ecological responses over multiple years and across different seasons within the same system (but see Hansen & Hayes, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a better understanding of the effects of dams, particularly across a range of dam sizes, is needed to guide management decisions and maximize the effectiveness of river restoration projects. Some studies have evaluated the ecological effects of small dams (<10 m height) to be able to predict how streams and watersheds were likely to respond to the potential removal of these dams (Ambers, 2007;Maloney et al, 2008;Skalak et al, 2009). Dam removal has become an increasingly practiced form of restoration, which has been proposed as a method to restore connectivity and to improve fluvial health, but it has been mainly applied to small and obsolete dams with poor structural conditions (American Rivers, Friends of the Heart and Trout Unlimited, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%