1987
DOI: 10.1016/0092-640x(87)90028-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in mean-square nuclear charge radii from optical isotope shifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
110
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at these very places, there appears another solution at a small ( 0.5 MeV) excitation with β having the same sign as and value close to that of MN. The calculated charge radii differ from their corresponding experimental values (where available) [19][20][21][22][23] only at second decimal place of a Fermi. These observations are now standard and well established (see, for example, Refs.…”
Section: Rmf Calculation: Results and Discussion Of Ground State mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, at these very places, there appears another solution at a small ( 0.5 MeV) excitation with β having the same sign as and value close to that of MN. The calculated charge radii differ from their corresponding experimental values (where available) [19][20][21][22][23] only at second decimal place of a Fermi. These observations are now standard and well established (see, for example, Refs.…”
Section: Rmf Calculation: Results and Discussion Of Ground State mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We now present the calculated charge radii for the parent nuclei in Fig. 1 along with the experimental values [27][28][29][30][31]. The calculated r c are found to be in good agreement with the corresponding experimental values.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…[57,58] for the density-dependent point-coupling interaction FKVW with explicit inclusion of ∆(1232) excitations (diamonds) used in the present work, and for the previous version [12] which did not include the ∆(1232) degree of freedom (cirles). [57], and the calculated charge isotope shifts in comparison with data [61], for the chain of even-A P b isotopes. The charge isotope shifts are defined: ∆r 2 ch = r 2 ch (A) − r 2 ch ( 208 P b) and ∆r 2 LD = r 2 LD (A) − r 2 LD ( 208 P b), where the liquid-drop estimate is r 2 LD (A) = 3 5 r 2 0 A 2/3 .…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 97%