2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-018-9885-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Mental Health Providers’ Recovery Attitudes and Strengths Model Implementation Following Training and Supervision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their positive attitudes to recovery improved (P < 0.01) on exit from placement, with consistent understandings of personal recovery also reported in the qualitative data. While there are no prior reports on recovery attitudes of undergraduate nursing students, these findings are generally consistent with the wider literature in mental health, where clinicians' recovery attitudes have been positive prior to recovery education intervention in health services (total score mean = 3.8 to 4.2), and improved further following education (mean = 4.3-4.4) (Chiba et al 2016;Deane et al 2018;Hornik-Lurie et al 2018). There are no prior studies to compare students' written understandings of personal recovery with; however, our qualitative findings indicated that on placement exit, students developed mental health literacy in terms of using more appropriate language to describe personal recovery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Their positive attitudes to recovery improved (P < 0.01) on exit from placement, with consistent understandings of personal recovery also reported in the qualitative data. While there are no prior reports on recovery attitudes of undergraduate nursing students, these findings are generally consistent with the wider literature in mental health, where clinicians' recovery attitudes have been positive prior to recovery education intervention in health services (total score mean = 3.8 to 4.2), and improved further following education (mean = 4.3-4.4) (Chiba et al 2016;Deane et al 2018;Hornik-Lurie et al 2018). There are no prior studies to compare students' written understandings of personal recovery with; however, our qualitative findings indicated that on placement exit, students developed mental health literacy in terms of using more appropriate language to describe personal recovery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We also tested the fit of the whole model having added only a specific item (see Table 3 and Table S2). All items added to each subscale (11,13,14,33,37, and 39) improved its internal reliability and the fit of the whole model considered as unidimensional, without substantially affecting the fit of the four-dimensional model. As it can be seen in Table S2, adding item 21 worsened all unidimensionality parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some measures assessed recovery in MHPs in the context of training and workshops. For instance, the Wellness Recovery Action Plan (Doughty et al 2008), Staff Attitudes to Recovery Scale (Crowe et al 2006), and Strengths Model Skills Survey (Deane et al 2019) measures were developed to assess the pre-and post-recovery knowledge and attitudes of MHPs.…”
Section: Measures Used To Assess Mhps' Perspectives Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%