2009
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200811126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Nearshore Zooplankton Associated with Species Invasions and Potential Effects on Larval Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis)

Abstract: We examined changes in the nearshore zooplankton community of South Bay, Lake Huron before (1982) and after (2002-2005) the invasions of dreissenid mussels and Bythotrephes longimanus and found substantial changes including lower cladoceran abundance, particularly Bosminidae, and higher copepod abundance after invasion. We also estimated changes in the energy content of zooplankton potentially available to larval lake whitefish before and after invasion using published values of energy content per unit mass. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bythotrephes could elevate consumer TPs directly, as it commonly reaches abundances greater than those of native invertebrate predators (Foster and Sprules 2009), and is a common prey item of planktivorous fishes following invasion (Coulas et al 1998;Mills et al 1992;Parker Stetter et al 2005). Bythotrephes may also elevate consumer TPs indirectly, as invasion has generally resulted in major changes in zooplankton community composition, characterized by declines in crustacean zooplankton abundance, richness, biomass, and productivity (Barbiero and Tuchman 2004;Boudreau and Yan 2003;Fernandez et al 2009;Strecker and Arnott 2008;Yan et al 2002). In most instances, zooplankton composition shifts to a more copepod dominated assemblage as Bythotrephes seems to have the greatest negative effect on cladoceran zooplankton (Strecker et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bythotrephes could elevate consumer TPs directly, as it commonly reaches abundances greater than those of native invertebrate predators (Foster and Sprules 2009), and is a common prey item of planktivorous fishes following invasion (Coulas et al 1998;Mills et al 1992;Parker Stetter et al 2005). Bythotrephes may also elevate consumer TPs indirectly, as invasion has generally resulted in major changes in zooplankton community composition, characterized by declines in crustacean zooplankton abundance, richness, biomass, and productivity (Barbiero and Tuchman 2004;Boudreau and Yan 2003;Fernandez et al 2009;Strecker and Arnott 2008;Yan et al 2002). In most instances, zooplankton composition shifts to a more copepod dominated assemblage as Bythotrephes seems to have the greatest negative effect on cladoceran zooplankton (Strecker et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent declines in growth rate and condition of Great Lakes lake whitefish have been widely documented (Pothoven et al 2001, Lumb et al 2007, Rennie et al 2009a), as has lake herring recruitment failure (Bronte et al 2003). Coincident with these changes are the successful colonization of Bythotrephes longimanus (Bronte et al 2003), and in the lower Great Lakes, dreissenids (Pothoven et al 2001), leading to concern regarding the impact of these invasive species on the growth, condition and recruitment of coregonid fishes (Fernandez et al 2009, Rennie et al 2009a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generalize, Lake Superior (the least productive, deepest, and coldest lake) has been dominated by calanoid copepods, whereas cladocerans and cyclopoids have been relatively more abundant in the lower four lakes (Barbiero et al, 2001;Patalas, 1972). Over the past decade, however, the zooplankton communities in Lakes Michigan and Huron have changed with cladocerans and cyclopoids declining in abundance (Barbiero et al, 2009a;Fernandez et al, 2009;Kerfoot et al, 2010), while calanoid copepods are either remaining stable or even increasing (Barbiero et al, 2009b;Fernandez et al, 2009). Possible explanations for these changes include: 1) ongoing declines in offshore nutrient concentrations (Barbiero et al, 2009a;Evans et al, 2011;Mida et al, 2010) and the resultant competitive advantages to calanoids (McNaught, 1975;Richman and Dodson, 1983;Santer, 1994); 2) the expansion of quagga mussels and their filtering of phytoplankton (Fahnenstiel et al, 1995;Vanderploeg et al, 2010) and microzooplankton (Kissman et al, 2010;MacIsaac et al, 1991;Pace et al, 1998) that herbivorous and omnivorous cladocerans and cyclopoids feed upon; 3) excessive planktivory from invertebrate predators such as Bythotrephes longimanus (Bunnell et al, 2011;Lehman, 1991;Lehman and Cáceres, 1993) that prefer herbivorous cladocerans (Schulz and Yurista, 1999;Vanderploeg et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%