2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in non-nutritive suck between 3 and 12 months

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, work from Martens and colleagues found that full-term infants significantly change their NNS duration, amplitude, burst number, cycles/burst and cycle number with no significant changes present in NNS frequency between 3 and 12 months. More specifically, three-month-old infants produced a median of 4.50 suck bursts per minute that contained 9.60 cycles/burst, resulting in a burst duration of 4.74 s ( Martens et al 2020 ). The median NNS frequency was 2.09 Hz, with an average amplitude of 14.05 cmH 2 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, work from Martens and colleagues found that full-term infants significantly change their NNS duration, amplitude, burst number, cycles/burst and cycle number with no significant changes present in NNS frequency between 3 and 12 months. More specifically, three-month-old infants produced a median of 4.50 suck bursts per minute that contained 9.60 cycles/burst, resulting in a burst duration of 4.74 s ( Martens et al 2020 ). The median NNS frequency was 2.09 Hz, with an average amplitude of 14.05 cmH 2 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bursts were defined two or more suck cycles in a row, with the cycles less than one second apart and each cycle's amplitude at least one cmH 2 0 (see example in Fig 1). This definition of burst is consistent with previous studies examining NNS in young infants [8,[37][38][39][40]. Following manual selection of all bursts, the best two minutes of NNS data were selected based on cycle number, which is a common procedure used across studies [8,[37][38][39] in an effort to examine the infant's most active NNS sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Twenty-five total infants (11 male, 14 female) participated in this study. NNS measurements from eleven of these infants were reported in an earlier paper [8]. Infants were evaluated at 3 months (average age = 3.04 months, range = 2.56-3.76 months) and at 12 months (average age = 11.97 months, range = 11.53-12.33 months).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While relatively little data are available on NNS, especially for infants residing in Puerto Rico, NNS metrics in our study participants are largely consistent with prior literature reported on infants 0–3 months ( Zimmerman and Foran, 2017 ; Zimmerman et al, 2020 ). For example, in a study of 26 full-term infants, Martens et al (2020) reported comparable ranges of NNS, with mean NNS frequency of 2.09 Hz (versus 1.9 ± 0.2 Hz in our study), mean cycles per burst of 9.6 (versus 11.5 ± 6.5 in our study), and average amplitude of 14.05 cmH 2 O (versus 17.1 ± 6.9 cmH 2 O in our study). ( Martens et al, 2020 ) The concordance of our NNS measures with prior research, together with our finding showing NNS to be similar across gender, maternal age, and pre-term birth status, suggest that our NNS measures may be generalizable to other populations; however, further characterization of NNS in other populations is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%