1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(16)31200-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Patient Screening for a Clinical Study of Dental Implants After Increased Awareness of Tobacco Use as a Risk Factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrates the effects of nicotine in the plasma on the bone remodeling process and the osseointegration of a titanium implant in a rat. While this study has focused the investigation on the exclusive effects of nicotine, exposure to smoking has already been widely shown to cause adverse effects on bone development and wound healing by it being a significant risk factor for osteoporosis (Egger et al 1996) as well as being associated with reduced bone density in the femur, vertebrae, and jawbone (Lemons et al 1997). In addition, there was decreased bone mineral content in smokers when compared with the bone mineral content between smokers and non‐smokers (Raikin et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study demonstrates the effects of nicotine in the plasma on the bone remodeling process and the osseointegration of a titanium implant in a rat. While this study has focused the investigation on the exclusive effects of nicotine, exposure to smoking has already been widely shown to cause adverse effects on bone development and wound healing by it being a significant risk factor for osteoporosis (Egger et al 1996) as well as being associated with reduced bone density in the femur, vertebrae, and jawbone (Lemons et al 1997). In addition, there was decreased bone mineral content in smokers when compared with the bone mineral content between smokers and non‐smokers (Raikin et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some authors, the predominant pattern of failure in the S patient is early failure, mainly after uncovering the implant, with a failure rate of 4.7% to 6.5% in S versus 2.8% to 3.3% in NS 40,53 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some authors, the predominant pattern of failure in the S patient is early failure, mainly after uncovering the implant, with a failure rate of 4.7% to 6.5% in S versus 2.8% to 3.3% in NS. 40,53 Risk is defined as the probability of developing a disease over a specific period of time. Dental researchers began assessing factors that may be associated with an increased risk of implant failure aiming at better understanding the reasons for failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that smoking can be associated with higher failure rates, complications and altered soft tissue conditions. [76][77][78][79][80][81][82] In general, smokers showed approximately twice the number of failures compared with non-smokers. While protocols have recommended a period of nonsmoking that covers the treatment phase, 83 it has also been suggested that patients should stop smoking because of the higher incidence of maxillary periimplantitis in smokers.…”
Section: Long-term Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%