Abstract:47 patients with vascular disease were divided into small vessel disease group (SVD), large vessel disease operated group (LVD-O) and large vessel disease nonoperated group (LVD-N). They were tested during their first hospitalization and at a follow-up some months later. There were no significant changes for any group on the Trail Making Test and on the Finger Tapping Test. On the WAIS the SVD made significant gains on the Verbal IQ (VIQ), Performance IQ (PIQ) and Full Scale IQ (FSIQ); the LVD-O made significa… Show more
“…Since many early studies fail to mention the proportion of stroke patients in their study [8, 9, 12, 14, 20], it is difficult to determine whether the control group was appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies including subgroup analysis have been more fruitful in identifying the conditions under which neuropsychological improvement is seen [1, 4, 9, 18, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29], although it is important to note that some of these analyses were post hoc examinations of the data and may reflect chance findings.…”
Background and Purpose: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. Results: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. Conclusion: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.
“…Since many early studies fail to mention the proportion of stroke patients in their study [8, 9, 12, 14, 20], it is difficult to determine whether the control group was appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies including subgroup analysis have been more fruitful in identifying the conditions under which neuropsychological improvement is seen [1, 4, 9, 18, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29], although it is important to note that some of these analyses were post hoc examinations of the data and may reflect chance findings.…”
Background and Purpose: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. Results: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. Conclusion: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.
“…Duke et al [21] and Diener et al [22] reported improvement only in intelligence tests, while King et al [23] reported improvement in perceptual (nonverbal) intelligence quotient. Other studies reported improvement in memory and verbal fluency [14], and improvements in memory and mental abilities [18].…”
We investigated changes in neuropsychological function in patients with carotid stenosis following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in relation to cerebral hemodynamics. The subjects were 24 patients who underwent CEA and 17 healthy controls matched by age, educational level, gender and handedness. Cerebral angiography, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and neuropsychological tests were performed approximately 1 week before and 3 weeks after CEA in all patients. In the patient group, the categories achieved in the new modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) improved significantly after CEA (4.0 ± 2.0; before CEA: 2.3 ± 2.1, p < 0.01). The perseverative errors of Nelson in the WCST improved significantly (before CEA: 9.1 ± 6.9, after CEA: 3.3 ± 3.4, p < 0.01). The difficulty maintaining set in the WCST improved significantly (before CEA: 2.3 ± 1.9, after CEA: 1.3 ± 1.7, p < 0.05). In the control group, none of the test scores showed significant improvement between the first and second tests. Moreover, frontal lobe function improved significantly in those patients with baseline carotid artery diameter of more than 70% of normal, or whose preoperative cerebral perfusion reserve was reduced by less than 15% of a response to acetazolamide. Our results suggest that CEA improves frontal lobe function in patients with severe carotid stenosis or reduced cerebral perfusion reserve.
“…Different dimensions have been studied as possible incidental factors on the result of the CEA relative to the variation in the cognitive functioning, such as the symptoms preceding the operation, while age and level of education were the demographic factors considered among most of the studies. Only one study assessed the intelligent quotient [18], while another study considered also medical factors such as clamp-time, number of strokes and time from the last TIA [13]. Concerning the psychological dimensions evaluated, the number of neuropsychological tests used ranged from 5 up to 34.…”
Results of the 39 studies considered suggest that, although few studies show cognitive deterioration, most of them show stability with a tendency to improve both in cognitive functions and in other psychological areas. Further research is needed to clarify when it would be appropriate the use of CEA, the characteristics of eligible patients, and psychological as well as physical expected outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.