2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05561-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Prostate Cancer Presentation Following the 2012 USPSTF Screening Statement: Observational Study in a Multispecialty Group Practice

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In 2012, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in men of all ages. Following this change, screening declined yet the complete impact on clinical presentation is not well defined in the screeneligible population. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the rates of PSA screening, prostate biopsy, incident prostate cancer detection, and stage IV at presentation in screen-eligible men in Kaiser Permanente Northern California changed following the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 As noted earlier, Black men present at earlier ages and with more advanced disease but are less likely to have access to screening and guideline-concordant care, when compared with other men. 101 The increasing use of precision genomics and medicine has the potential to improve outcomes for all men with prostate cancer; however, genomic efforts and clinical studies have been highly Eurocentric, and there is a risk of widening disparities in the precision medicine era if efforts continue to not include cohorts that are representative of local, national, and global populations. [102][103][104][105][106] Efforts to address racial differences in prostate cancer outcomes have largely been focused on investigating the contribution of social versus biologic factors in high-risk populations.…”
Section: Prostate Cancer Disparities: Genomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 As noted earlier, Black men present at earlier ages and with more advanced disease but are less likely to have access to screening and guideline-concordant care, when compared with other men. 101 The increasing use of precision genomics and medicine has the potential to improve outcomes for all men with prostate cancer; however, genomic efforts and clinical studies have been highly Eurocentric, and there is a risk of widening disparities in the precision medicine era if efforts continue to not include cohorts that are representative of local, national, and global populations. [102][103][104][105][106] Efforts to address racial differences in prostate cancer outcomes have largely been focused on investigating the contribution of social versus biologic factors in high-risk populations.…”
Section: Prostate Cancer Disparities: Genomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, a higher rate of de novo metastatic disease was present in the 2016 cohort than in 2009. In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) gave a grade D (discourage the use of this service) recommendation for prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening for all age groups [ 21 ]. This large retrospective study of nearly 900,000 screen-eligible men from 2010 and 2015 found a 23.4% (95% CI 23.0 - 23.8%) reduction of screening rates between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, the recommendations were changed again and advised that an informed discussion take place between patients and providers about PSA screening. Black patients likely have lower rates of PSA testing because of lack of consistent information and education, along with numerous other barriers (Table 1) [29–34].…”
Section: Disparities In Prostate Cancer Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%