Changes in psychological status and health-related quality of life following total shoulder arthroplasty

Cho, Chul-Hyun; Coats-Thomas, Margaret S.; Warner, Jon J.P.

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.018

Cited by 7 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In letzter Konsequenz leitet sich dabei auch die Empfehlung ab, den richtigen Zeitpunkt des endoprothetischen Gelenkersatzes nicht zu verpassen und den Patienten bereits im Vorfeld dahingehend zu informieren und zu führen. Auf der anderen Seite konnte klar gezeigt werden, dass die Lebensqualität nach Gelenkersatz bei Omarthrose signifikant steigt [40,41,42] und es dadurch gerade bei älteren Patienten keinen plausiblen Grund gibt, den Eingriff unnötig hinauszuzögern.…”

Section: Endoprothetischer Gelenkersatzunclassified

Omarthrose – Pathogenese, Klassifikation, Diagnostik und Therapie

Tauber

Martetschläger²

2019

Orthopäde

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online teilnehmen 3 Punkte sammeln auf CME.SpringerMedizin.de Teilnahmemöglichkeiten Die Teilnahme an diesem zertifizierten Kurs ist für 12 Monate auf CME.SpringerMedizin.de möglich. Den genauen Teilnahmeschluss erfahren Sie dort. Teilnehmen können Sie:-als Abonnent dieser Fachzeitschrift,-als e.Med-Abonnent. Als Abonnent von Der Orthopäde oder Der Unfallchirurg können Sie kostenlos an CME-Kursen beider Zeitschriften teilnehmen. Zertifizierung Diese Fortbildungseinheit ist zertifiziert von der Ärztekammer Nordrhein gemäß Kategorie D und damit auch für andere Ärztekammern anerkennungsfähig. Es werden 3 Punkte vergeben. Anerkennung in Österreich und der Schweiz Gemäß Diplom-Fortbildungs-Programm (DFP) werden die auf CME.SpringerMedizin.de erworbenen Fortbildungspunkte von der Österreichischen Ärztekammer 1:1 als fachspezifische Fortbildung angerechnet (§26(3) DFP Richtlinie). Der Orthopäde ist durch die Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Orthopädie mit 1 Credit pro Modul anerkannt.

show abstract

Section: Endoprothetischer Gelenkersatzunclassified

Omarthrose – Pathogenese, Klassifikation, Diagnostik und Therapie

Tauber

Martetschläger²

2019

Orthopäde

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The high prevalence of shoulder pain (7-21%) in the general population results in high, and increasing, levels of disability and health-care costs [1,2]. Glenohumeral arthritis is the primary cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction in an aging population [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Glenohumeral arthritis is the primary cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction in an aging population [1]. Psychological issues such as depression, anxiety, and decreased quality of life (QoL) are associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain [1][2][3][4]. The combined physical and psychosocial impacts of shoulder pain are complex and contribute to lower quality of life [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such treatments have a predictable outcome for patients with joint destruction arising from pathologies such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritisand proximal humeral head fracture [8][9][10]. Previous studies indicated significant improvement of both psychological status and healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL) by 3-months after surgery [2,11]. However, implant issues, such as loosened glenoid components can lead to poorer outcomes over the longer-term [3,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A narrative review and content analysis of functional and quality of life measures used to evaluate the outcome after TSA: an ICF linking application

MacDermid

Rosenbaum

2020

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is considered as the standard reconstructive surgery for patients suffering from severe shoulder pain and dysfunction caused by arthrosis. Multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed and validated that can be used to evaluate TSA outcomes. When selecting an outcome measure both content and psychometric properties must be considered. Most research to date has focused on psychometric properties. Therefore, the current study aims to summarize what PROMs are being used to assess TSA outcomes, to classify the type of measure (International society for quality of life (ISOQOL) using definitions of functioning, disability, and health (FDH), quality of life (QoL) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)) and to compare the content of these measures by linking them to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Methods: A literature review was performed in three databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL to identify PROMs that were used in TSA studies. Meaningful concepts of the identified measures were extracted and linked to the relevant second-level ICF codes using standard linking rules. Outcome measures were classified as being FDH, HRQoL or QoL measures based on the content analysis. Result: Thirty-five measures were identified across 400 retrieved studies. The most frequently used PROM was the American Shoulder and Elbow Society score accounting for 21% (246) of the total citations, followed by the single item pain-related scale like visual analog scale (17%) and Simple Shoulder Test (12%). Twelve PROMs with 190 individual items fit inclusion criteria for conceptual analysis. Most codes (65%) fell under activity and participation categories. The top 3 most predominant codes were: sensation of pain (b280; 13%), hand and arm use (d445; 13%), recreational activity (d920; 8%). Ten PROMs included in this study were categorized as FDH measures, one as HRQoL measure, and one as unknown.

show abstract

“…But the difficulty of discussing those opportunities, limited access to psychosocial expertise, and lack of coordination with the patient's other care providers, can make it easier for us to decide to stay in our comfort zone, address what we can address, and limit our offerings to tests, referrals (like physical therapy), injections, and surgery, rather than start potentially uncomfortable conversations about the patient's emotional well-being. Our habits are reinforced by the fact that people with substantial symptoms of depression or less-effective coping strategies often do improve after treatment [2,6]. On the other hand, in the absence of sham-surgery-controlled trials, we cannot know how much of that improvement is from alterations in pathophysiology and how much is because the intervention was a trigger for an increase in resiliency (our ability to adapt to difficulties).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%