2016
DOI: 10.1177/1077558715616024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Public Prenatal Care Coverage Options for Noncitizens Since Welfare Reform

Abstract: Before 1996, most lawfully present noncitizens were eligible for the same prenatal Medicaid benefits as U.S. citizens. However, the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA)-welfare reform-restricted benefits for certain lawful noncitizens for the first time. Welfare reform also gave states unprecedented authority to determine Medicaid eligibility. More recent federal policy changes have allowed states to cover some noncitizen pregnant women initially excluded under welfare … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only recently has literature emerged exploring the potential health trajectory among this population within the current political climate and the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; 2010; Agrawal & Venkatesh, 2015; H. Brown, Wilson, & Angel, 2015; Green, Hochhalter, Dereszowska, & Sabik, 2015; Hacker, Anies, Folb, & Zallman, 2015; Joseph, 2016). The purpose of this review was to provide evidence for existing health disparities among immigrants based on ethnicity, immigration status, country of origin, length of time in the United States, and access to health care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently has literature emerged exploring the potential health trajectory among this population within the current political climate and the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; 2010; Agrawal & Venkatesh, 2015; H. Brown, Wilson, & Angel, 2015; Green, Hochhalter, Dereszowska, & Sabik, 2015; Hacker, Anies, Folb, & Zallman, 2015; Joseph, 2016). The purpose of this review was to provide evidence for existing health disparities among immigrants based on ethnicity, immigration status, country of origin, length of time in the United States, and access to health care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although states receive a federal match (currently at 88% to 100% 62 ) for the CHIP Unborn Child Option, since 2008 take-up has been stagnant 63 ; only one additional state (Missouri in 2015 64 ) has expanded access to comprehensive prenatal coverage regardless of documentation status. This suggests that political factors may be preventing states from taking up a relatively inexpensive and critical initiative, which should be cause for concern among pediatricians considering the crucial role of health insurance for both maternal and children's access to care and health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also have identified several different areas of potential interventions at the clinic and policy levels to mitigate these barriers to care. These potential interventions include adjusting clinic scheduling practices and adopting the "Unborn Child" option in North Carolina to allow for coverage of all low-income women irrespective of documentation status [29,20].…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%