2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04139-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Recommendation Rating Systems, Analyst Optimism, and Investor Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars provide evidence that reputation and career concern is a crucial counterfactor against analysts' optimism bias (Fang & Yasuda, 2009; Jackson, 2005; Ljungqvist et al, 2007). Moreover, regulatory reforms and legal enforcement aiming to limit the relationship between research and investment banking departments (e.g., the Global Settlement and NASD Rule 2711 in the US and the Market Abuse Directive in Europe) can reduce analysts' propensity to issue biased research (Corwin et al, 2017; Dubois et al, 2014; Tseng & Wilson, 2019). We add to this literature by showing that the relaxation of short‐sale constraints, a market reform that improves stock price efficiency and reduces information asymmetry, can restrain analysts' conflicts and enhance their independence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars provide evidence that reputation and career concern is a crucial counterfactor against analysts' optimism bias (Fang & Yasuda, 2009; Jackson, 2005; Ljungqvist et al, 2007). Moreover, regulatory reforms and legal enforcement aiming to limit the relationship between research and investment banking departments (e.g., the Global Settlement and NASD Rule 2711 in the US and the Market Abuse Directive in Europe) can reduce analysts' propensity to issue biased research (Corwin et al, 2017; Dubois et al, 2014; Tseng & Wilson, 2019). We add to this literature by showing that the relaxation of short‐sale constraints, a market reform that improves stock price efficiency and reduces information asymmetry, can restrain analysts' conflicts and enhance their independence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%