2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in renovation policies in the era of sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, here the first regulation concerning the However, new buildings have little influence on the overall demand, since their incidence on the whole building stock is very low. Nowadays, new edifices increase the existing stock on average by less than 1.5% every year (Figure 6), while the demolition rate is estimated around 0.2-0.5% per year [4,28]. Therefore, nearly 85% of European building stock predicted for 2030 has already been built.…”
Section: Energy Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, here the first regulation concerning the However, new buildings have little influence on the overall demand, since their incidence on the whole building stock is very low. Nowadays, new edifices increase the existing stock on average by less than 1.5% every year (Figure 6), while the demolition rate is estimated around 0.2-0.5% per year [4,28]. Therefore, nearly 85% of European building stock predicted for 2030 has already been built.…”
Section: Energy Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, here the first regulation concerning the Figure 6. Annual growth rate of new buildings added to the existing stock by nation [28].…”
Section: Energy Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rome shows the maximum ERP of 95.80% and 89.02% for scenario B and scenario A respectively, while the minimum ERP of 53.32% and 47.12% for scenario B and scenario A respectively is in Messina. Naples has the highest relative difference of 8.43% between scenario B and A, while Catania has the lowest, 3 Evaporative cool tower (CT) with automatic control presents in Rome the highest DRP of 98.56% and 95.69% for scenario A and B respectively; the lowest DRP value of 73.48% for scenario A is in Messina and the lowest DRP of 69.89% for scenario B is in Naples. Naples depicts the maximum percentage difference of 4.18% between the two scenarios and Rome the minimum of 2.87%.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing concern about rational use of energy and the limits of land urbanization identifies the great potential of energy refurbishment of existing buildings [2,3] for energy consumption reduction and environmental impact mitigation. Energy refurbishment consists in applying the most appropriate technology to achieve improved energy performance while maintaining satisfactory levels of service and indoor hygrothermal comfort, under operational constraints [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, Italy has several funding laws and decrees for promoting energy conservation measures when not mandatory, by means of various shares of funding, from 40 to 65% of capital costs [12][13][14]. Similar laws were enacted in other European countries and, regarding this, a focus on Denmark, Sweden, Germany and France was recently proposed by Baek and Park [15], who underlined the necessity of well-calibrated energy policies for promoting effective refurbishments. In the same vein, Di Pilla et al [16] conducted a worthy investigation concerning the present and future trends of public incentives in the design of refurbishment with reference to the Italian panorama.…”
Section: Introduction: Importance Of Large-scale Energy Retrofit Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%