An understanding of the biochemical mechanisms which regulate both the activity and the selectivity of RNA polymerase (RNA nucleotidyltransferase) in mammalian cells should be facilitated by the availability of mutant cell lines containing altered RNA polymerase activities. Mutations affecting the activity of RNA polymerase II in several cultured cell lines have already been described. These mutations are of three types: resistance to the RNA polymerase II inhibitor a-amanitin (4, 12, 23), conditional lethal temperature-sensitive (TS) mutations in polymerase 11 (11), and several second-site mutations that revert the TS effects on growth of a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) TS polymerase II mutation (22). With this limited number of mutants, it is clear that only a modest beginning has been made in genetically defining the various components of the transcription complex in animal cells; indeed, both the AmaR and the TS mutations are in the same complementation group (22). Although these mutations have been of some use in demonstrating the regulated synthesis of polymerase II subunit polypeptides (7,8,24), there exists a need for both better characterization of the existing mutations and the isolation of a wider spectrum of mutations affecting RNA synthesis in animal cells. Such goals could be more readily realized were the gene(s) for eucaryotic RNA polymerase II isolated.Gene isolation has, for the most part, been accomplished to date by using DNA cloning of abundant mRNA species, but the isolation of genes represented only infrequently in mRNA populations, such as those for RNA polymerase II polypeptides, requires different experimental approaches. DNA transfer of genes expressing selectable phenotypes to appropriate recipient cells, followed by recombinant DNA screening to rescue transforming DNA, has been shown to be a successful method for the isolation of the genes coding for less abundant enzymes, such as thymidine kinase (19) and adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (10). However, despite the codominant inheritance of a-amanitin resistance, gene transfer of the AmaR phenotype has proven difficult in several laboratories. In this study we show that with an alternative approach, involving transfer of the dominant wild-type TS' gene to the TS BHK-21 cell line TsAF8, it is possible to establish that the TS defect in TsAF8 is a polymerase II mutation and that the gene determining sensitivity to a-amanitin is the TS' polymerase II gene.
MATERILS AND METHODS