2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11055-023-01395-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Sociability and Preference for Social Novelty in Female Rats in Prolonged Social Isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are largely consistent with other studies conducted in rats (Bishnoi et al, 2021; Knight et al, 2021), although sex differences are not always seen across both behavioral tests (Scholl et al, 2019). The majority of social isolation studies have been conducted in males (Kinley et al, 2021; Walker et al, 2019) and suggest that isolation effects can vary based on strain and timing of isolation (Burke et al, 2017; Oliveira et al, 2019; Shirenova et al, 2023). Additionally, whether the sex differences related to locomotion or anxiety have been the subject of discussion (Bishnoi et al, 2021; Brenes et al, 2009; Fernandes et al, 1999; Silvestre et al, 1999; Walker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are largely consistent with other studies conducted in rats (Bishnoi et al, 2021; Knight et al, 2021), although sex differences are not always seen across both behavioral tests (Scholl et al, 2019). The majority of social isolation studies have been conducted in males (Kinley et al, 2021; Walker et al, 2019) and suggest that isolation effects can vary based on strain and timing of isolation (Burke et al, 2017; Oliveira et al, 2019; Shirenova et al, 2023). Additionally, whether the sex differences related to locomotion or anxiety have been the subject of discussion (Bishnoi et al, 2021; Brenes et al, 2009; Fernandes et al, 1999; Silvestre et al, 1999; Walker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social interaction might be assessed in a couple of freely moving animals, placed in a simple or enriched context [ 12 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Alternatively, “guest” animals might be fixed with tether and collar assemblies [ 30 , 32 ], separated in a compartment of the test arena [ 33 , 34 , 35 ], or encaged [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The social stimuli might be isolated by partitions, which specifically limit or restrict visual, audial, haptic, or olfactory sensory inputs involved in animal interactions [ 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%