2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in soil microbial community structure under elevated tropospheric O3 and CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies showed that the microbial community composition and structure was affected by eCO 2 (Feng et al, 2010;He et al, 2010bHe et al, , 2012bDeng et al, 2012;Hayden et al, 2012), eO 3 and/or eCO 2 þ eO 3 (Phillips et al, 2002;Kasurinen et al, 2005;Kanerva et al, 2008). For example, a previous study at the BioCON site showed that eCO 2 increased plant and microbial biomass, soil pH and moisture and significantly shifted the functional and phylogentic/taxonmoic composition, structure and network interactions of soil micorbial communities (Zhou et al, 2010;He et al, 2010bHe et al, , 2012bZhou et al, 2011;Deng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies showed that the microbial community composition and structure was affected by eCO 2 (Feng et al, 2010;He et al, 2010bHe et al, , 2012bDeng et al, 2012;Hayden et al, 2012), eO 3 and/or eCO 2 þ eO 3 (Phillips et al, 2002;Kasurinen et al, 2005;Kanerva et al, 2008). For example, a previous study at the BioCON site showed that eCO 2 increased plant and microbial biomass, soil pH and moisture and significantly shifted the functional and phylogentic/taxonmoic composition, structure and network interactions of soil micorbial communities (Zhou et al, 2010;He et al, 2010bHe et al, , 2012bZhou et al, 2011;Deng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a significant discrimination of sole-carbon source utilization patterns was observed for the wheat rhizosphere soil but not for the bulk soil, and the functional diversity of the rhizosphere microbial communities was reduced under eO 3 (Chen et al, 2009). Also, a few studies at the Aspen FACE site (Larson et al, 2002;Phillips et al, 2002;Chung et al, 2006;Holmes et al, 2006;Zak et al, 2007) and with open-top chambers (Kasurinen et al, 2005) or mesocosms (Kanerva et al, 2008) indicated that eO 3 altered the functional diversity, structure and/or metabolic potential of soil microbial communities. In this study, our results did not fully support the above hypothesis that eO 3 would alter the overall functional diversity and structure of rhizosphere microbial communities.…”
Section: Shifts Of Functional Gene Representation Under Eo 3 X Li Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, most studies on the effect of eO 3 on rhizosphere microbial communities were largely based on open-top chambers, and the results mainly focused on the changes of microbial biomass and structure by phospholipid fatty acid analysis, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis methods (Kasurinen et al, 2005;Chung et al, 2006;Kanerva et al, 2008), and/or singlestrand conformation polymorphism method (Dohrmann and Tebbe, 2005). Those studies indicated that eO 3 had little or significant effects on soil microbial communities with different plants/ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLPP and PLFA analyses showed that carbon degradative microbes and the microbial structure of surface soil under paddy rice were altered in response to eO 3 , and PLFAs showed much more change than CLPPs (Chen et al, 2010). Seven meadow species were exposed to eO 3 for three growing seasons, and the PLFA results of bulk soil showed that bacterial, actinobacterial, and fungal PLFAs and the fungal:bacterial PLFA ratio were decreased (Kanerva et al, 2008). In the same study, the decrease in the total microbial PLFA biomass in the bulk soil of Lathyrus pratensis under eO 3 and eCO 2 (elevated CO 2 ) (both p = 0.050) arose from reductions in the PLFA biomass of indicator subgroups for actinobacteria (29% and 31%), bacteria (26% and 33%) and mycorrhiza (i.e., AM fungi) (31% and 35%) in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%