1967
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1967.002.01.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in terrestrial vertebrate faunas during the Mesozoic

Abstract: Summary The precise time-range of any terrestrial group is difficult to establish, due to the uncertainties of preservation and discovery and due to the difficulty of ascertaining the relative ages of faunas from different areas. Differences between such faunas may be due to ecological and zoogeographical factors as well as to age differences. Even when a relative time-sequence has been established, it is difficult to correlate this with the standard section for the period; this is particularly true … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focus has been given to two inferred mass extinction events, at the Carnian-Norian and Triassic-Jurassic boundaries, and two alternative scenarios for the rise of the dinosaurs, the so-called ''competitive'' and ''opportunistic'' models. Studies from the mid-late 20th Century postulated that the replacement of various tetrapod groups, notably pseudosuchians and therapsids, by dinosaurs was a long-term affair driven by competition during the Late Triassic (Cox, 1967;Charig, 1980;Bonaparte, 1982). Its outcome would have been the dominance of dinosaurs over terrestrial ecosystems from Norian/Jurassic onwards, thanks to their ''superiority'' relative to the outcompeted contemporary tetrapods, pushed to extinction.…”
Section: (2) Lucky Break?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus has been given to two inferred mass extinction events, at the Carnian-Norian and Triassic-Jurassic boundaries, and two alternative scenarios for the rise of the dinosaurs, the so-called ''competitive'' and ''opportunistic'' models. Studies from the mid-late 20th Century postulated that the replacement of various tetrapod groups, notably pseudosuchians and therapsids, by dinosaurs was a long-term affair driven by competition during the Late Triassic (Cox, 1967;Charig, 1980;Bonaparte, 1982). Its outcome would have been the dominance of dinosaurs over terrestrial ecosystems from Norian/Jurassic onwards, thanks to their ''superiority'' relative to the outcompeted contemporary tetrapods, pushed to extinction.…”
Section: (2) Lucky Break?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archosaurs, however, are generally considered a 'successful' radiation of vertebrates for many reasons: they have persisted for hundreds of millions of years; have achieved a global distribution; are and have been exceptionally taxonomically diverse (at least by tetrapod standards); have occupied a range of body types and ecological niches; and are and have been locally abundant in individual faunas and ecosystems. The obvious question is why archosaurs (especially dinosaurs) have been able to achieve such success, and there has been no shortage of hypotheses and speculation (e.g., Cox 1967;Crompton 1968;Bakker 1971;Robinson 1971;Sill 1974;Halstead 1975;Charig 1980Charig , 1984Welles 1986). However, many of these hypotheses are extremely difficult, perhaps even impossible, to test.…”
Section: The Archosaur Radiation: a General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Red Beds and overlying Cave Sandstone are generally considered to be Norian and/or Rhaetic (Cox 1973). The division between Cave Sandstone and Red Beds does not correspond to the division between the Norian and Rhaetic, and the age of the transition between these beds appears to differ from locality to locality.…”
Section: Locality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%