2006
DOI: 10.4039/n05-034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of an old field site in southern Ontario, revisited after 34 years

Abstract: We investigated changes in a wild bee community by repeating a detailed historical study of bee biodiversity in Ontario. In 1968 and 1969 (period 1), an inventory of bee species was taken from an old field habitat in southern Ontario. We resampled the bee fauna in 2002 and 2003 (period 2), following the same methods. Bee species richness, diversity, and evenness were significantly greater in period 2, and this was observed in all functional guilds except wood-nesting, pollen specialist, and nonnative bees. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are likely many more species to be discovered as indicated by our species rarefaction test. Previous longterm studies also support this notion, as 1 year of intensive sampling cannot fully represent the bee community due to considerable species composition turnover in most ecosystems (Minckley et al 1999;Grixti and Packer 2006). In addition to the broad diversity of bee species, we also found at least one introduced species that appears to be expanding its range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…There are likely many more species to be discovered as indicated by our species rarefaction test. Previous longterm studies also support this notion, as 1 year of intensive sampling cannot fully represent the bee community due to considerable species composition turnover in most ecosystems (Minckley et al 1999;Grixti and Packer 2006). In addition to the broad diversity of bee species, we also found at least one introduced species that appears to be expanding its range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…S1A). Modest richness declines are in accordance with the few field data available (22,23). For Bombus, species richness declined by 30% over the 140-y period (permutation test P = 0.01; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The higher species richness reported in our study may be due to the identification of all specimens belonging to the taxonomically challenging but speciose subgenus Lasioglossum (Dialictus). Nonetheless, the number of species we found is lower than that known for non-urban habitats in the countryside around Toronto, Ontario (Grixti and Packer 2006;Grixti and Packer unpublished data). The Potential of Green Roofs for Pollinator Conservation…”
Section: Bees On Green Roofs and In Urban Areascontrasting
confidence: 39%