2017
DOI: 10.15324/kjcls.2017.49.3.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Blood Components Caused by Water Intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a seasonal effect on hematology values (PCV, RBC, monocytes, and M:H ratio) and welfare indicators in this study. Higher PCV and RBC have been observed in humans [52,53] and horses [54] during the winter in association with dehydration, although there was no indication that the healthy calves in this study experienced a lack of water. Monocytes and the M:H ratio were higher in the winter compared to the other two seasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…There was a seasonal effect on hematology values (PCV, RBC, monocytes, and M:H ratio) and welfare indicators in this study. Higher PCV and RBC have been observed in humans [52,53] and horses [54] during the winter in association with dehydration, although there was no indication that the healthy calves in this study experienced a lack of water. Monocytes and the M:H ratio were higher in the winter compared to the other two seasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Studies have shown that water intake may improve anaemia by increasing the hemoglobin index [24]. Our result did not confirm this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…'s study (12.54 g dL −1 ) was lower than the results for mice in this study (15.17 g dL −1 ), suggesting other (endo)parasites may have greater negative effects on their hosts. However, it is important to note that haemoglobin variation can be affected by several different variables, such as altitude (Storz et al ., 2007), age (Wilde et al ., 2018) and dehydration (Kim et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%