Early concepts of the control of reproductive development emphasized the importance of nutritional parameters (7,8,11,14), particularly C/N ratios in the entire plant (12). Many of these ideas were not sustained in subsequent studies (13), and, hence, nutritional hypotheses were assigned a supportive rather than regulatory role in reproductive development. Numerous studies with monocarpic and polycarpic species showed that flower initiation and development have apparently higher light flux requirements than continued leaf initiation (18). There is also considerable evidence, for many photoperiodic species, that high photon flux may replace all or part of the day length requirements for the transition from vegetative to reproductive development (2,3,9,15,18). Since the high light flux is generally in the photosynthetically active range, it seemed as ifchanged levels ofphotosynthesis, or assimilates derived therefrom, played an important role in inductive processes in the leaves and/or as a morphogenetic signal in the shoot apical meristem (5, 10). Bodson (2) obtained evidence for an early increase, before cytological evidence for evocation, in carbohydrate levels in apical buds of Sinapis following induction by LD3 or displaced SD.In a comprehensive review of the effects of nutritional factors, acting as substrates or osmotica, on tissue differentiation and organogenesis, Allsopp (1) assigned a determining, not merely ' Permanent address: