1989
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19890205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the distribution of the genetic variance of a quantitative trait in small populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This loss of additive genetic variation decreases heritability (i.e., the proportion of phenotypic variation (V P ) that is heritable, h 2 ϭ V A /V P ). Decreases in heritability can then be directly related to decreases in adaptive potential by the standard breeder's equation, R ϭ h 2 S. These expectations have been validated in several experimental studies, which have measured either heritability (Whitlock and Fowler 1999;Saccheri et al 2001) or the response to artificial selection (James 1971;Frankham 1980;Franklin 1980;Lopez-Fanjul et al 1989;Wade et al 1996) immediately following bottleneck events.If the loss of genetic variation occurs gradually over an extended number of generations (e.g., O'Brien 1994;Taylor et al 1994), rather than during a rapid bottleneck event, then this basic drift model must be extended to incorporate the polygenic mutation rate (V M ). Under the drift-mutation (DM) model, the expected change in additive genetic variance is V M Ϫ V A /2N e each generation (Clayton and Robertson 1955), which eventually leads to a nonzero heritability of 2N e V M /…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This loss of additive genetic variation decreases heritability (i.e., the proportion of phenotypic variation (V P ) that is heritable, h 2 ϭ V A /V P ). Decreases in heritability can then be directly related to decreases in adaptive potential by the standard breeder's equation, R ϭ h 2 S. These expectations have been validated in several experimental studies, which have measured either heritability (Whitlock and Fowler 1999;Saccheri et al 2001) or the response to artificial selection (James 1971;Frankham 1980;Franklin 1980;Lopez-Fanjul et al 1989;Wade et al 1996) immediately following bottleneck events.If the loss of genetic variation occurs gradually over an extended number of generations (e.g., O'Brien 1994;Taylor et al 1994), rather than during a rapid bottleneck event, then this basic drift model must be extended to incorporate the polygenic mutation rate (V M ). Under the drift-mutation (DM) model, the expected change in additive genetic variance is V M Ϫ V A /2N e each generation (Clayton and Robertson 1955), which eventually leads to a nonzero heritability of 2N e V M /…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss of additive genetic variation decreases heritability (i.e., the proportion of phenotypic variation (V P ) that is heritable, h 2 ϭ V A /V P ). Decreases in heritability can then be directly related to decreases in adaptive potential by the standard breeder's equation, R ϭ h 2 S. These expectations have been validated in several experimental studies, which have measured either heritability (Whitlock and Fowler 1999;Saccheri et al 2001) or the response to artificial selection (James 1971;Frankham 1980;Franklin 1980;Lopez-Fanjul et al 1989;Wade et al 1996) immediately following bottleneck events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The process of extraction of an equilibrium population will form an inbreeding population. One consequence of inbreeding is changes in the distribution of genetic variance (Lopez-Fanjul et al, 1989;Fernandez et al, 1995;Fowler and Whitlock, 1999;Whitlock and Fowler, 1999). Under the assumption of segregation generation starting from selfing heterozygous individuals in the base population can form the structure of the F 2 genotypes (Falconer and Mackay, 1996;Kearsey and Pooni, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%