During development, covalent modification of both, histones and DNA contribute to the specification and maintenance of cell identity. Repressive modifications are thought to stabilize cell type specific gene expression patterns, reducing the likelihood of reactivation of lineage-unrelated genes. In this report, we review the recent literature to deduce mechanisms underlying Polycomb and H3K9 methylation mediated repression, and describe the functional interplay with activating H3K4 methylation. We summarize recent data that indicate a close relationship between GC density of promoter sequences, transcription factor binding and the antagonizing activities of distinct epigenetic regulators such as histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and histone demethylases (HDMs). Subsequently, we compare chromatin signatures associated with different types of transcriptional outcomes from stable repression to highly dynamic regulated genes, strongly suggesting that the interplay of different epigenetic pathways is essential in defining specific types of heritable chromatin and associated transcriptional states.
KEY WORDS: transcriptional control, histone lysine methylation, methyltransferase, demethylase, polycombGenetic and epigenetic mechanisms ensure that complex developmental programs are correctly executed. One important posttranslational modification that regulates transcriptional outcomes, genome integrity and cellular identity is histone lysine methylation. Defined methylation patterns are related to distinct functional readouts of chromosomal DNA. The initial discoveries of histone modifying enzymes lead to the postulation of the "histone code" hypothesis, whereby defined histone modifications, acting in a combinatorial or sequential fashion on one or multiple histone termini, specify the transcriptional state of a gene by recruitment of regulatory proteins. In this review, we discuss the indexing potential of histone lysine methylation in the light of how histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and histone demethylases (HDMs) are targeted to given promoter contexts, how the GC content of target promoters influences the regulatory response, and how the functional interplay between HMTs and HDMs ultimately defines transcriptional states. For in-depth discussions of the developmental functions of individual HMTs and HDMs, we refer the reader to recent reviews Martin and Zhang, 2005) (Fig. 1). We first summarize new insights gained by the recent epigenomic profiling studies of histone methylation and Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53: 335-354 (2009) Abbreviations used in this paper: AR, androgen receptor; CpG, cytosineguanidine dinucleotide; ER, estrogen receptor; HDM, histone demethylase; HMT, histone methyltransferase; NHR, nuclear hormone receptor; PcG, polycomb group; PTM, post translational modification; RNAPII, DNAdependent RNA-polymerase II; TrxG, trithorax group; TSS, transcriptional start site.transcription factor occupancy in relation to transcriptional ON and OFF states. We mainly focus on the dynamics of activating H3...