This study examines differences in conceptual knowledge representations among three groups of students with different levels of study of chemistry. Variation in the structural characteristics of participants' concept maps on the topic of acid-base equilibrium were sought by indirect means. Year 12 secondary chemistry students, undergraduate chemistry majors and honours, masters and doctoral candidates participated in the study. Paired propositional links in the concept maps for the three groups were analysed by the scaling algorithms "Pathfinder" and multidimensional scaling. Results show differences among groups in the structural significance in the networks of abstract process-related nodes and matter-related nodes. Implications for theories of conceptual change are discussed.This study is located within a theoretical paradigm which acknowledges that thinking can be understood in terms of cognitive procedures which operate on representational phenomena in the mind (Thagard, 1996;Vosniadou, 1995). It has been argued that performance of a cognitive task in a specific domain involves the "construction of a mental representation which is determined by the properties or attributes of the concepts involved, by the interrelationships among them and the naive theories within which these concepts are embedded, and the task itself'" (Saitta et al., 1995, p. 11 I). If higher-order cognitive task performance is dependent upon configurations of conceptual knowledge with particular attributes, then research to elucidate the nature of these configurations is needed. As Vosniadou (1995, p. 23) has argued from a cognitive perspective "more attention needs to be paid to the development of theories of knowledge representation and representational change." Individuals with expertise in a variety of domains have been shown to have more extensive and more organised knowledge bases than novices and their knowledge differs from that of novices in that experts represent more and different relations among concepts than do novices