2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2021.106952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the interfacial charge-transfer resistance of Mg metal electrodes, measured by dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attias et al. [ 76 ] studied the interfacial resistance of a Mg electrode by staircase galvanostatic EIS and measured a high charge‐transfer resistance at OCV which quickly diminishes upon polarization (only toward negative potentials). A plating mechanism in which the identity of the adsorbed species changes during the polarization and subsequent plating was thus proposed.…”
Section: Plating and Stripping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Attias et al. [ 76 ] studied the interfacial resistance of a Mg electrode by staircase galvanostatic EIS and measured a high charge‐transfer resistance at OCV which quickly diminishes upon polarization (only toward negative potentials). A plating mechanism in which the identity of the adsorbed species changes during the polarization and subsequent plating was thus proposed.…”
Section: Plating and Stripping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge transfer occurring before complete desolvation would also be in agreement with the measured decrease of the charge transfer resistance (by impedance spectroscopy) when a negative bias potential is applied to a Mg metal anode. [ 76 ] If any, the coulombic interaction between Cl – or solvent ligands with a Mg 0 adatom would be significantly lower than with Mg + or Mg 2+ and would explain why no such charge transfer resistance decrease was measured upon polarization toward positive potentials, because at higher potential the Mg complex remain unchanged.…”
Section: Plating and Stripping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EDL capacitance (C dl ) of the Bi 2 O 3 @CNTs electrode is significantly lower than that of the CNTs one, indicating the planar surface of the Bi 2 O 3 @CNTs electrode owing to the attachment of Bi 2 O 3 particles on the CNTs sidewalls at the defect points. Moreover, the Warburg element (W a ) of the electrode decreased in the presence of Bi 2 O 3 , proving that Bi 2 O 3 contributed toward decreasing the porosity of CNTs, thereby limiting the diffusion of the electrolyte onto the electrode [52]. The enhanced charge transfer in Bi 2 O 3 @CNTs electrodes is demonstrated by the lower electrical resistance (R e ) when compared to that of the CNTs because of the hybridization reactions between the Bi-6p 3 [53].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mg anodes can behave reversibly only in passivation‐free conditions. Any side reactions of Mg anodes in electrolyte solutions that form surface films are supposed to block the Mg metal anodes because there is no solid electrolyte interface (SEI) options for surface films comprising ionic Mg compounds [12,13] . Thereby, only ether solvents can be relevant because these solvents are polar enough to dissolve several suitable electrolytes, but they are not reacting with Mg metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%