Changes in the Quality of Care for Bipolar I Disorder During the 1990s

Abstract

Objective-This study estimated changes during the 1990s in the quality of usual-care treatment among persons diagnosed as having bipolar I disorder in a privately insured population.Methods-Retrospective private insurance administrative data were analyzed for enrollees aged 18 to 64 who were diagnosed as having bipolar I disorder during 1991 (431 person-years), 1994 (598 person-years), and 1999 (600 person-years). Medication and psychotherapy quality indicators were derived from bipolar disorder expert guidelines published in 1994, which were consistent with guidelines published until year 2002.Results-The unadjusted prevalence of receiving any lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine improved over the study period (68 percent in 1991, 64 percent in 1994, and 77 percent in 1999), whereas, compared with 1991, receiving any antidepressant in the absence of lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine increased in 1994 and then declined in 1999 (13 percent in 1991, 23 percent in 1994, and 14 percent in 1999). The unadjusted prevalence of receiving any psychotherapy declined steadily and sharply (94 percent in 1991, 89 percent in 1994, and 69 percent in 1999). The unadjusted prevalence of receiving any lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine and therapy together declined over time (65 percent in 1991, 58 percent in 1994, and 54 percent in 1999). After the analyses adjusted for patient characteristics, these changes were significant from p<.01 to p<.001.Conclusions-The prevalence of receiving the pharmacotherapy recommended in the guidelines improved after guideline publication in 1994, whereas other quality measures that included receiving psychotherapy declined throughout the study period. These results suggest different psychotherapeutic modalities are under differing constraints under managed care, constraints that overpower consensus in the literature of quality practice. Policy makers should measure a variety of key therapeutic modalities when measuring quality in order to capture these differences.Bipolar disorder is chronic, recurring, disabling (1-4), and often deadly (5,6). It is estimated to have higher direct health care costs per person than diabetes, other general medical conditions, and major depression (7), as well as all other psychiatric illness in a privately insured population (8). Also, departures from evidenced-based treatment-such as delaying or not providing medications like lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine-have been associated with higher health care costs (9). Despite the significant personal, economic, and social consequences of bipolar disorder, the existing literature raises quality concerns ranging from accurate diagnosis (10) to appropriate pharmacotherapy (9,11,12) and adequate monitoring of lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine (13,14).Beginning in the 1990s the development of new pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy has improved the potential to effectively treat bipolar disorder. Treatment guidelines have reflected this growing evidence base. Concurrently, the 1990s saw an increase in the...

Systematic literature review on patterns of pharmacological treatment and adherence among patients with bipolar disorder type I in the USA

“…One study addressed patterns of recommended pharmacotherapy in patients with BD-I through the years 1991–1999 and concluded that rates of recommended medication treatment improved after the publication of the American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines in 1994. 19 In other research, conducted in academic centers as part of the STEP-BD program, prescribing psychiatrists trained for participation in the study provided treatment concordant with recommendations for around 80% of patients with different patterns of BD. 37…”

“…One survey conducted in 2005 reported that 64.1% of psychiatrists make routine use of clinical guidelines when deciding on treatment, 45 and there is research showing improved appropriateness of therapy after implementation of clinical practice guidelines. 19 Still, one study conducted in academic centers with patients receiving care by trained psychiatrists reported higher rates of recommended pharmacological therapy for BD as a whole and for BD-I specifically. 37 These findings, in collection, strongly suggest that psychiatrists trained according to the recommendations from clinical practice guidelines may provide a more appropriate pharmacotherapy for patients with BD.…”

Mobile Interventions for Severe Mental Illness

“…Utilization of psychosocial interventions is declining in bipolar disorder (Busch et al, 2007), despite mounting evidence for its role in augmenting pharmacotherapy (Miklowitz, 2008). In schizophrenia, the Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) report indicated poor utilization of psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia (Lehman et al, 2004).…”

Accurately Predicting Bipolar Disorder Mood Outcomes

“…For example, we compared the prevalence of comorbid SUD as defined by the “limited detail” model in STEP-BD bipolar-I participants with those in prior administrative data-based studies. 26–29 STEP-BD treating clinicians identified a higher prevalence of SUD (privately insured=34%, Medicaid insured=38%) than the administrative data studies (privately insured 3% and 8%; Medicaid 24%). Given prior literature on the prevalence of comorbid SUD in bipolar disorder outpatient populations, 30,31 it appears that comorbid SUD was better detected in STEP-BD than the administrative data studies cited above.…”