2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0870-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in trauma management following the implementation of the whole-body computed tomography: a retrospective multi-centre study based on the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU®)

Abstract: Routine use of WBCT is not superior to a combination of conventional radiography, ultrasound and focused CT in terms of mortality. The entire process involving the introduction of the trauma scan and the further development of algorithms has caused changes that can be observed in the trauma room setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapidly identifying and initiating treatment for life-threatening injuries can improve clinical outcomes for trauma patients; however, such clinically significant injuries are often overlooked in the presence of more obvious external injuries, resulting in delayed diagnoses and contributing to trauma mortality [1][2]. Computed axial tomography (CT) can provide sensitive and specific evaluations of trauma patient injuries [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Innovations in the current generation of CT systems enable improvements in the speed, accuracy, quality, and availability of such injury evaluations [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rapidly identifying and initiating treatment for life-threatening injuries can improve clinical outcomes for trauma patients; however, such clinically significant injuries are often overlooked in the presence of more obvious external injuries, resulting in delayed diagnoses and contributing to trauma mortality [1][2]. Computed axial tomography (CT) can provide sensitive and specific evaluations of trauma patient injuries [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Innovations in the current generation of CT systems enable improvements in the speed, accuracy, quality, and availability of such injury evaluations [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniform CT scanning for trauma patients can reduce the rates of missed injuries resulting from an inadequate examination, reducing the rates of avoidable mortality. For these reasons, it may be beneficial to utilize CT imaging as a screening tool in all trauma patients, including those considered to have normal physical examinations [3][4][5][6][7][8]12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the workflow in cases of life-threatening situations as well as the optimization of scan parameters in trauma management needs to be addressed [16]. There are many researchers who show no benefits of WBCT versus selective radiological workup [17][18][19] as well as those who point out many benefits of immediate cross-sectional imaging [20,21]. There are other studies that suggest a selected approach [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the indication for surgery is set by clinical and radiological diagnosis. The diagnostic work-up for patients with multiple trauma has undergone a paradigm shift from the conventional approach (ultrasound and conventional radiography) to whole-body CT as the first diagnostic tool used in trauma centres [2][3][4][5][6][7]. For this purpose, a CT scanner is located directly in or nearby the resuscitation area of the emergency room or trauma suite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%