2014
DOI: 10.1186/1749-7221-3-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Two Point Discrimination and the law of mobility in Diabetes Mellitus patients

Abstract: BackgroundDiabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Two-point discrimination (TPD) is one method of quantitatively testing for loss of nerve function. The law of mobility for TPD is known for normal subjects in earlier studies but has not been studied for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for TPD among DM subjects.MethodsThe Semmes Weinstein monofilament (SWMF) was used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This delayed response to treatment is consistent with a study that found greater significant improvement in neural latencies six months post-operatively, compared to one month (Mondelli et al, 2000). Since two-point discrimination is a quantitative, effective measure of sensory perception (Periyasamy et al, 2008), the changes are expected to parallel those of neural conduction, both being linked to the health of the median nerve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This delayed response to treatment is consistent with a study that found greater significant improvement in neural latencies six months post-operatively, compared to one month (Mondelli et al, 2000). Since two-point discrimination is a quantitative, effective measure of sensory perception (Periyasamy et al, 2008), the changes are expected to parallel those of neural conduction, both being linked to the health of the median nerve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Two point discrimination was performed in a subset of fourteen O-PN at the point of the great toe, though only five O-PN subjects had the ability to feel the points for the test. The average distance at which these five O-PN subjects could discern two points of pressure was 1.03 ± 0.32 cm (average of both feet) compared with values from another study of healthy older subjects of approximately 0.5 cm (Periyasamy, Manivannan, & Narayanamurthy, 2008). Peripheral neuropathy patients in other studies have previously demonstrated a two point discrimination distance of 2.5 cm (Periyasamy et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The average distance at which these five O-PN subjects could discern two points of pressure was 1.03 ± 0.32 cm (average of both feet) compared with values from another study of healthy older subjects of approximately 0.5 cm (Periyasamy, Manivannan, & Narayanamurthy, 2008). Peripheral neuropathy patients in other studies have previously demonstrated a two point discrimination distance of 2.5 cm (Periyasamy et al, 2008). While this is greater than the average distance noted in our subjects, it must be reinforced that the majority of our subjects could not feel the points of pressure at all, indicating substantial decline in cutaneous sensation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Motor functions evaluated included balance using an ataxia battery (stand heel to toe, walk 10 steps on line, balance on one leg in eyes open and eyes closed conditions) (Fregly, ) and upper limb motor function using Grooved Pegboard (Trites, ) and Fine Finger Movement (Fama et al, ). Objective signs of neuropathy (Cornblath et al, ; Kaku & Simpson, ) comprised perception of vibration [right or left great toe; normal = 0, impaired (<10 s unilaterally or bilaterally) = 1], deep tendon ankle reflexes [right or left ankle; normal = 0, impaired (absent or hypoactive at least unilaterally or bilaterally) = 1], and 2‐point discrimination (performed on right or left soles of feet) (Periyasamy, Manivannan, & Narayanamurthy, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comprised perception of vibration [right or left great toe; normal = 0, impaired (<10 s unilaterally or bilaterally) = 1], deep tendon ankle reflexes [right or left ankle; normal = 0, impaired (absent or hypoactive at least unilaterally or bilaterally) = 1], and 2-point discrimination (performed on right or left soles of feet)(Periyasamy, Manivannan, & Narayanamurthy, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%