1993
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1993.1068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Vegetation and Soil During Succession Following Landslide Disturbance in the Central Himalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4c) showed a trend different from that of the number of individuals and the number of species; it increased proportionately to the age of scar. The increase in the total basal areas of woody plant, total stem volume, and the amount of vegetation biomass with the age of a shallow landslide scar was also reported in the investigations of Reddy and Singh (1993) and Matsumoto et al (1999aMatsumoto et al ( , 1999b.…”
Section: Vegetation Successionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4c) showed a trend different from that of the number of individuals and the number of species; it increased proportionately to the age of scar. The increase in the total basal areas of woody plant, total stem volume, and the amount of vegetation biomass with the age of a shallow landslide scar was also reported in the investigations of Reddy and Singh (1993) and Matsumoto et al (1999aMatsumoto et al ( , 1999b.…”
Section: Vegetation Successionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As a consequence, sediment runoff is accelerated by surface erosion, and the environment for vegetation growth highly deteriorates owing to water and nutrient deficiency in the soil (Shimokawa 1984;Shimokawa et al 1989;Reddy and Singh 1993;Smale et al 1997;Matsumoto et al 1999aMatsumoto et al , 1999b. However, the deteriorated condition of landslide affected areas gradually recovers with time as vegetation and topsoil develop (Shimokawa 1984;Trustrum and De Rose 1988;Shimokawa et al 1989;Reddy and Singh 1993;Smale et al 1997;Matsumoto et al 1999aMatsumoto et al , 1999b. Previous reported that the vegetation succession is deeply correlated with the development of topsoil in a shallow landslide scar (Shimokawa 1984;Shimokawa et al 1989;Matsumoto et al 1999aMatsumoto et al , 1999b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have too little data to extrapolate further, but landslide soils might reach pre-disturbance levels (hypothetical in many highly disturbed landscapes; Walker and del Moral 2003) after 250 year (constant rate of accrual) to 500 year (declining rate; Zarin and Johnson 1995b). Of course, successional dynamics can be much slower, with little or no colonization on some landslides even after 20 year (Dalling 1995) or faster (with full recovery of both C and N within 40 year) as seen on Himalayan landslides (Pandey and Singh 1985;Reddy and Singh 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrasts in plant species composition and physical charac teristics are often apparent between landslide scars and the surrounding vegeta tion (e.g., Mark et al, 1989;Veblen and Ashton, 1978;Miles et al, 1984;Simon et al, 1990;Reddy and Singh, 1993), although considerable spatial variation in plant cover and physical variables also is evident within landslide scars. In the White Mountains of the northeastern United States, Flaccus (1959) reported lower organic matter content and available calcium, magnesium, and potassium in soils on landslide scars than in the adjacent forest.…”
Section: Slopes Affected By Slope Failure and Mass Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%