2015
DOI: 10.1675/063.038.0306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Vegetation Cover Explain Shifts of Colony Sites by Little Terns (Sternula albifrons) in Coastal Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prey density alone is unlikely to account for all the variation in bird density [54]—for example, GSE had the highest average shorebird density, but not the highest average prey density. Other variables, such as vegetation cover [55] and prey availability, which are associated with water depth [56], should be incorporated into future studies. Determination of the dynamic interaction between shorebirds and the density of benthic macroinvertebrates (e.g., sites with more abundant macroinvertebrates would attract more shorebirds, which, in turn, could suppress the abundance of macroinvertebrates) would give a better insight into the ecological communities and help in the conservation of the wetland ecosystem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prey density alone is unlikely to account for all the variation in bird density [54]—for example, GSE had the highest average shorebird density, but not the highest average prey density. Other variables, such as vegetation cover [55] and prey availability, which are associated with water depth [56], should be incorporated into future studies. Determination of the dynamic interaction between shorebirds and the density of benthic macroinvertebrates (e.g., sites with more abundant macroinvertebrates would attract more shorebirds, which, in turn, could suppress the abundance of macroinvertebrates) would give a better insight into the ecological communities and help in the conservation of the wetland ecosystem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally, Little Terns are mainly found breeding on beaches and coastal salinas but are known to occupy a wider spectrum of habitats like salt marshes, dams and riverine habitats (Cramp, 1985;Huang, 2015). Vegetation cover may play a key role in habitat selection and may vary according to habitats for both Little Tern (Goutner, 1990;Ratcliffe et al, 2008;Lopes et al, 2015) and Common Tern (Blokpoel et al, 1978;Yésou et al, 2005) and this preference may explain the "fugitive strategy" adopted by the former species in its nomadic search for optimal breeding conditions (Lopes et al, 2015). On the Po River, Italy, the extent of bare sands was shown to determine the breeding frequency of both Little Tern and Common Tern (Fasola & Bogliani, 1984).…”
Section: Habitat and Nest Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such short-term perturbations may be attributed to various food availability (Tryjanowski et al 2009;Karell et al 2009), the avoidance of nest predation (Szymkowiak and Kuczyński 2015), annual changes in the availability of ephemeral habitats (Tucker et al 2004), rapid habitat loss (Zuckerberg and Vickery 2006), diseases or extreme weather conditions in breeding areas, migration routes and wintering grounds (Conrey et al 2016;Becker and Finck 1985;Robinson et al 2007). Ground-nesting species are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in water levels and vegetation structure and respond to these changes by shifting between breeding sites in optimal and sub-optimal years, leading to annual fluctuations in abundance (Sharps et al 2017;Shuford 2016;Lopes et al 2015). However, local population changes may also come from a very specific, nomadic breeding strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%