2019
DOI: 10.3390/en13010115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Wave Energy in the Shelf Seas of India during the Last 40 Years Based on ERA5 Reanalysis Data

Abstract: Ocean wave energy is one of the cleanest renewable energy sources around the globe, but wave energy varies widely from place to place and from time to time. The long-term variability of wave power at 20 locations in the Indian shelf seas from 1979 to 2018 is described here using the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts recently released ERA5 reanalysis hourly data. The variability is calculated on a yearly and monthly basis for the locations based on the coefficient of variation. The annual avera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this study form the primary input for planning wind farms in the Indian shelf seas. Recently Amrutha and Kumar [36] reported the wave energy resources in the same locations in the Indian shelf seas, and the data presented in this article could be used for planning hybrid energy converters in the shelf seas of India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results presented in this study form the primary input for planning wind farms in the Indian shelf seas. Recently Amrutha and Kumar [36] reported the wave energy resources in the same locations in the Indian shelf seas, and the data presented in this article could be used for planning hybrid energy converters in the shelf seas of India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(Ramon et al, 2019). CAWCR data also contain a change in both wind forcing and wave model physics (to account for the wind forcing change) which could have imparted inconsistencies particularly for trend analysis (Smith et al, 2021) whereas ERA5 is more consistent and has been successfully used to determine long-term trends (Amrutha & Sanil Kumar, 2019;Takbash & Young, 2020). Hence, the trend and interannual variability results derived here used ERA5 wave products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of ERA5 and CAWCR global deepwater ocean wave models against in‐situ buoy data around the South African coast indicated that the former was more accurate, consistent with ERA5 near‐surface winds having previously been shown to be about 30% more accurate than an ensemble mean of reanalysis products (Ramon et al., 2019). CAWCR data also contain a change in both wind forcing and wave model physics (to account for the wind forcing change) which could have imparted inconsistencies particularly for trend analysis (Smith et al., 2021) whereas ERA5 is more consistent and has been successfully used to determine long‐term trends (Amrutha & Sanil Kumar, 2019; Takbash & Young, 2020). Hence, the trend and interannual variability results derived here used ERA5 wave products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, numerous regional studies have also been conducted. For example, the North Pacific (NP) (Bromirski et al 2005(Bromirski et al , 2013Yang and Oh 2020), North Atlantic (NA) (Bromirski and Kossin 2008;Bromirski and Cayan 2015;Santo et al 2015), Black Sea (Aydogan et al 2013), along the Australian coasts (Hemer et al 2016(Hemer et al , 2018, and shelf seas of India (Kumar and Anoop 2015;Sannasiraj and Sundar, 2016;Amrutha et al 2019;Amrutha and Kumar 2020). However, seasonal/annual variations in extreme WP have not been assessed yet at the global and regional scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%