2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of bond strength properties of hot-dip galvanized plain bars with cement paste after 1 year of curing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corrosion rate and free corrosion potential values are stated in Table 3. When the block is flooded, the active zinc (free corrosion potential falls in the range between −1000 and −1100 mV vs. SCE (Saturated Calomel Electrode)) corrosion rate is very high, while hydrogen is formed [6,11,22]. Upon reducing the relative humidity to 95%, the corrosion rate dropped; however, based on the values of free corrosion potentials, zinc was still active in terms of corrosion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The corrosion rate and free corrosion potential values are stated in Table 3. When the block is flooded, the active zinc (free corrosion potential falls in the range between −1000 and −1100 mV vs. SCE (Saturated Calomel Electrode)) corrosion rate is very high, while hydrogen is formed [6,11,22]. Upon reducing the relative humidity to 95%, the corrosion rate dropped; however, based on the values of free corrosion potentials, zinc was still active in terms of corrosion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A protective layer on rebar created by conventional hot-dip galvanizing has several indisputable advantages—primarily, it provides high resistance for the coating, even in carbonated concrete, higher tolerance to chlorides, and also its affordable price [5]. Research [6] as well as practice [7] showed that significant corrosion damage (with hydrogen evolution—see Equation (1)) to the coating in fresh and curing concrete increases porosity at the interface with the cement paste [6,8,9], reducing bond strength between the rebar and concrete. 2H2normalO+2eH2+2OH…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the results of testing the bond strength between the prestressing reinforcement and UHPC (see Figure 10), the validity of the general equation T c,i (Equation (2)) for a conventional ribbed bar reinforcement can be confirmed in the area with already significant deceleration of the bond stress growth (~0.5 mm slip) [42]. The effect of relaxation due to increasing temperature on bond is not considered in this work.…”
Section: Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To simplify, the mechanical properties of concrete for bond strength tests can be characterized by compressive strength, both in the case of prestressing reinforcing bars [26] and conventional rib reinforcing bars [39,40]. Bond strength for concrete with an arbitrary steel profiled reinforcement (T c,i -bond force) can be characterized by the bond strength factor if (Equation 2 [41,42]). Bond strength factors (i f -Equation (2)) take into account the contributions of individual physical forces-i fad (factor of adhesion force), i ff (factor of friction force), i fσ (factor takes into account mechanical properties of concrete).…”
Section: Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, introducing a galvanized concrete element to the reinforcement causes some disturbances at the metal-concrete interface. The standard explanation with reference to the mechanical aspects should also include electrochemical issues [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Three fundamental processes are generally involved in transmitting stress from the rebar to concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%