2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of gut microbiota between different weight reduction programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the 59 studies, 36 studies applied a pre-post design (baseline measurements provided) (Group 1: n = 23 [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]; Group 2: n = 10 [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]; Group 3: n = 4 [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]). Sixteen studies used a cross-sectional design (Group 1: n = 6 [ 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]; Group 2: n = 10 [ 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of the 59 studies, 36 studies applied a pre-post design (baseline measurements provided) (Group 1: n = 23 [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]; Group 2: n = 10 [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]; Group 3: n = 4 [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]). Sixteen studies used a cross-sectional design (Group 1: n = 6 [ 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]; Group 2: n = 10 [ 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in GI microbiota was the primary outcome for 24 studies in Group 1 [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 94 ] and 12 studies in Group 2 [ 61 , 62 , 64 , 65 , 68 , 82 , 85 , 86 , 88 , 90 , 92 , 95 ]. For the remaining studies, primary outcomes surrounding clinical, anthropometric and metabolic parameters were reported (Group 1: n = 5 [ 43 , 46 , 50 , 58 , 74 ]; Group 2: n = 13 [ 60 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 , 80 , 81 , 83 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researches on the relationship between gut intervention and blood pressure focused on metabolic surgery, such as sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and RYGB surgery (11,12). The bypass surgery is probable to lower blood pressure through regulating gut hormones secretion and gut microbiota, as well as reducing sympathetic nervous system activity (5,(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the blood pressure -lowering effect secondary to surgery may be weight loss independent. The potential underlying mechanisms of the blood pressure -lowering effects following RYGB include enhanced secretion of incretins, such as GLP-1 and PYY ( Ochner et al, 2011 ), reducing leptin levels ( Rodriguez et al, 2012 ), alerting microbiota in the GI tract ( Lin et al, 2019 ), increasing excretion of urinary sodium ( Docherty et al, 2017 ), and decreasing sympathetic nervous system activity ( Zhang et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Sympathetic Nervous System and Roux-en-y Gastric Bypassmentioning
confidence: 99%