1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb12397.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of quantal transmitter release caused by gadolinium ions at the frog neuromuscular junction

Abstract: 1 The actions of the trivalent cation, gadolinium (Gd3+), were studied on frog isolated neuromuscular preparations by conventional electrophysiological techniques. 2 Gd3+ (450pM) applied to normal or formamide-treated cutaneous pectoris nerve-muscle preparations induced, after a short delay, a complete block of neuromuscular transmission. The reversibility of the effect was dependent on the time of exposure. 3 Gd3 + (5-450gM) had no consistent effect on the resting membrane potential of the muscle fibres. 4 Gd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies of perineural Ca 2+ currents are performed in the presence of higher concentrations of K + channel blockers (high K + channel block Ringer–see e.g. Molgo et al ., 1991; Redman & Silinsky, 1995; Katz et al ., 1995). Whilst the prolonged Ca 2+ currents in this solution may or may not be relevant to the Ca 2+ current that promotes ACh release (Anderson et al ., 1988; Redman & Silinsky, 1995; Katz et al ., 1995), such high concentrations of K + channel blockers; (i) minimize the possibility of any secondary effects of Ba 2+ on unblocked K + channels and (ii) eliminate the confounding effects of Ba 2+ on residual outward current contaminants as such contaminants are rare in the presence of these high concentrations of K + channel blockers (Katz et al ., 1995–see also Silinsky & Solsona, 1992 and Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of perineural Ca 2+ currents are performed in the presence of higher concentrations of K + channel blockers (high K + channel block Ringer–see e.g. Molgo et al ., 1991; Redman & Silinsky, 1995; Katz et al ., 1995). Whilst the prolonged Ca 2+ currents in this solution may or may not be relevant to the Ca 2+ current that promotes ACh release (Anderson et al ., 1988; Redman & Silinsky, 1995; Katz et al ., 1995), such high concentrations of K + channel blockers; (i) minimize the possibility of any secondary effects of Ba 2+ on unblocked K + channels and (ii) eliminate the confounding effects of Ba 2+ on residual outward current contaminants as such contaminants are rare in the presence of these high concentrations of K + channel blockers (Katz et al ., 1995–see also Silinsky & Solsona, 1992 and Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary results suggest that the entry of Ca2+ through N-type Ca2+ channels elicits evoked ACh release in frog motor nerve endings (Kerr & Yoshikami, 1984;Arnon, David, Hevron & Yaari, 1988;Robitaille, Adler & Charlton, 1990;Molgo, Del Pozo, Banos & Angaut-Petit, 1991). It would thus appear of interest to confirm the presence of N-type Ca2+ currents in this species and to examine the effect of adenosine on such currents in the hope of providing further information on the mechanism by which this purine inhibits transmitter release.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ca2+ current may be contaminated to a limited degree (generally less than 25%) by Na+ currents and by the passive current flow associated with the repolarization of the nerve ending (see e.g. Hamilton & Smith, 1991 in rat;Molgo et al 1991 in frog). For example, the current in Fig.1B, w-conotoxin was not further reduced by adding Co2+ or removing extracellular Ca2+, suggesting that w-conotoxin was producing a maximal inhibition of Ca2+ currents and that the remainder of the upward tracing, in Fig.…”
Section: General Electrophysiological Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…have generally examined only the effects of a single metal ion (e.g. Balnave & Gage, 1973;Weakly, 1973;Forshaw, 1977;Molgo et al, 1991;Satoh et al, 1982) and have not, as in the present study, systematically compared a range of metal ions. However, there have been two other studies using a series of metal ions, but they have measured the effect of the ions on twitch tension (Lin-Shiau & Fu, 1980) and extracellularly recorded presynaptic ion channel currents (Hamilton & Smith, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%