2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of Rainfall Partitioning and Canopy Interception Modeling after Progressive Thinning in Two Shrub Plantations on the Chinese Loess Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore the relative importance of the parameters in the two models, a sensitivity analysis was conducted with respect to five parameters (S, c, E=R, P t , S t ) in the RGAM and three parameters (S, c, E=R) in the Liu model (Figure 8). decreases with increasing canopy structural characteristics, including tree density, basal area, and LAI (Beidokhti & Moore, 2021;Jeong et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2019;Niu et al, 2023;Wei et al, 2017 2020), smaller basal area caused the larger T f in the study by Wang et al (2013). The T f for PT Â RP at the Ansai site was larger than for PT but smaller than for RP (Table 3), aligning with the results of other studies that reported the T f for RP is larger than for PT at the same or similar tree density (Ding et al, 2021;Li et al, 2020;Ma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To explore the relative importance of the parameters in the two models, a sensitivity analysis was conducted with respect to five parameters (S, c, E=R, P t , S t ) in the RGAM and three parameters (S, c, E=R) in the Liu model (Figure 8). decreases with increasing canopy structural characteristics, including tree density, basal area, and LAI (Beidokhti & Moore, 2021;Jeong et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2019;Niu et al, 2023;Wei et al, 2017 2020), smaller basal area caused the larger T f in the study by Wang et al (2013). The T f for PT Â RP at the Ansai site was larger than for PT but smaller than for RP (Table 3), aligning with the results of other studies that reported the T f for RP is larger than for PT at the same or similar tree density (Ding et al, 2021;Li et al, 2020;Ma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…After removing the heavy rainfall events (>50 mm day À1 ), the simulated I c values for individual rainfall events estimated using the RGAM were evenly distributed around the 1:1 line (simulated I c : measured I c ; Figures 4 and 5) and cumulative simulated and measured I c were also well fitted (Figures 5 and 6). Heavy rainfall events tend to cause larger underestimation of I c , as reported by many studies (Fathizadeh et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2019;Niu et al, 2023). The NSE values for the RGAM were comparable to other studies (0.56-0.93) conducted in temperate forests (Fan et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Performance Of the Rgam And Liu Modelsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations