2022
DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2022.2117697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing attitudes: lessons for countering the trafficking of cultural objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among various international treaties, an important one is the UNESCO 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property treaty, which was intended to help limit the sale of illegally obtained heritage objects and thereby potentially limiting damage to heritage sites where cultural objects come from (UNESCO 2022). While over 140 countries have now ratified this international treaty, enforcement and attitudes towards enforcing this and other similar treaties have been argued to be weak, including in relative priorities for law enforcement (Runhovde 2022). This potentially necessitates more time efficient tools that demand less resources to aid law enforcement, particularly if the priority in allocating financial and personnel resources in preventing looting or illicit removal of cultural objects from sites is likely to remain low in the future.…”
Section: Looting Of Heritage Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various international treaties, an important one is the UNESCO 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property treaty, which was intended to help limit the sale of illegally obtained heritage objects and thereby potentially limiting damage to heritage sites where cultural objects come from (UNESCO 2022). While over 140 countries have now ratified this international treaty, enforcement and attitudes towards enforcing this and other similar treaties have been argued to be weak, including in relative priorities for law enforcement (Runhovde 2022). This potentially necessitates more time efficient tools that demand less resources to aid law enforcement, particularly if the priority in allocating financial and personnel resources in preventing looting or illicit removal of cultural objects from sites is likely to remain low in the future.…”
Section: Looting Of Heritage Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%