1991
DOI: 10.2307/377823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Business as Usual: Reader Response in the Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we can have multiple interpretations rather a single correct interpretation of a text according to RRA (Amer, 2003). As cited in Amer (2003) there are different ways to implement RRA in literature classes including:  Reading Logs (Benton and Fox, 1985;Carlisle, 2000);  Response Journal (Sheridan, 1991);  Writing Prompts (Pritchard, 1993);  Critical Questioning and Writing (Probst, 1994;Hirvela, 1996);  Self-questioning (Davis,1989);  Role-play, Drama and Letter-writing (Elliot, 1990;Baxter, 1999); and  Rewriting Narratives from Another Character's Point of View (Oster, 1989) As Amer (2003) argues though SGA favors the cognitive aspect of the learners and RRA favors the affective aspect, these two approaches should not be considered as totally separate but they should both be used judiciously depending on the language ability level of the students.…”
Section:  Reader Response Approach (Rra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can have multiple interpretations rather a single correct interpretation of a text according to RRA (Amer, 2003). As cited in Amer (2003) there are different ways to implement RRA in literature classes including:  Reading Logs (Benton and Fox, 1985;Carlisle, 2000);  Response Journal (Sheridan, 1991);  Writing Prompts (Pritchard, 1993);  Critical Questioning and Writing (Probst, 1994;Hirvela, 1996);  Self-questioning (Davis,1989);  Role-play, Drama and Letter-writing (Elliot, 1990;Baxter, 1999); and  Rewriting Narratives from Another Character's Point of View (Oster, 1989) As Amer (2003) argues though SGA favors the cognitive aspect of the learners and RRA favors the affective aspect, these two approaches should not be considered as totally separate but they should both be used judiciously depending on the language ability level of the students.…”
Section:  Reader Response Approach (Rra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sheridan (1991), the readers must "invest themselves in the experience." That, of course, does not preclude the examination of symbolic structure, motifs, and other literary concerns.…”
Section: Reader-response Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be clarified that RRT was not conceived of as a language learning approach originally but it has been adapted and adopted by researchers who belong to this applied linguistics domain (see the works by Carlisle, 2000;Davis, 1989;Hirvela, 1996Hirvela, , 2001Liaw, 2001). Sheridan (1991) notes that in a reader-response classroom, the proper subject of writing is the experience of reading itself. He argues that students will benefit most when their writing helps them become better readers.…”
Section: Connections Between Theory and Literature Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%