Objectives: To assess current attitudes, practices, and knowledge of Canadian psychiatrists regarding fitness to drive in individuals with mental illness and to explore variations according to provincial legislation.
Method:We carried out a national cross-sectional survey, using a random sample of psychiatrists. We used a mail survey to collect data.
Results:In total, 248 psychiatrists participated; the response rate was 54.2% on traced subjects. The majority (64.1%) reported that they strongly agreed or agreed that addressing patients' fitness to drive is an important issue. However, only 18.0% of respondents were always aware of whether their patients were active drivers. One-fourth strongly agreed or agreed that they were confident in their ability to evaluate fitness to drive. In discretionary provinces, 29.3% of psychiatrists reported not knowing their provincial legislation, as did 14.6% of psychiatrists in mandatory provinces; of those responding, 54.0% from discretionary provinces and 2.8% from mandatory provinces gave incorrect answers.
Discussion:Psychiatrists' responses demonstrate a broad range of attitudes, practices, and knowledge. There appears to be a large gap between what is expected of psychiatrists and their readiness and self-perceived ability to make informed clinical decisions related to driving safety.
Conclusion:There is a clear need for education and guidelines to assist psychiatrists in decision making about driving fitness. (Can J Psychiatry 2006;51:836-846) Information on funding and support and author affiliations appears at the end of the article.
Clinical Implications· It is important for psychiatrists to consider their patients' fitness to drive. · Education and guidelines are needed to assist psychiatrists in determining fitness to drive.
Limitations· The small sample size decreased the statistical power. · The findings may have limited generalizability. · There is a possible refusal bias.