2017
DOI: 10.3130/jaabe.16.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Korean Housing System and Its Structural Forces

Abstract: This research aims to examine the historical evolution of the developmental housing system in South Korea, to elicit the characteristics of the system and to explore the structural forces realigning the system. The primary findings are as follows: 1) the Korean housing system strongly supports economic growth and has been formed by a state-controlled, market-driven, pro-homeownership policy, forcing housing to be highly commodified; 2) the state's export-oriented, industrialization-led economic development pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TMHD permanently changed the course of housing and urban development in Korea (Ronald and Lee, 2012). The Korean program helped transition the majority of the country’s households from living in single-family homes to apartments (Lee, 2017; Choi et al , 2013; Park and Ferrari, 2011). The TMHD also resulted in lower-income households concentrated outside of urban centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TMHD permanently changed the course of housing and urban development in Korea (Ronald and Lee, 2012). The Korean program helped transition the majority of the country’s households from living in single-family homes to apartments (Lee, 2017; Choi et al , 2013; Park and Ferrari, 2011). The TMHD also resulted in lower-income households concentrated outside of urban centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the TMHD, the recent mass housing initiative substantially increased unit size and quality as well as public financing for low-income housing stock, longstanding issues for recipient households (Kim, 1997). The latter helped stimulate increased partnership with the private sector (Lee, 2017). As a result, Korea’s public rental units nearly doubled and there have been aspirations to further increase these units to more than 10 plus per cent of national stock in the near future (Kim and Park, 2016; Ronald and Jin, 2010).…”
Section: Korea’s Two Million Housing Drive (Tmhd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backed by the persistence of high demand for housing from the second half of the twentieth century, the housing system of South Korea (hereafter Korea) has aimed at the efficient use of limited land, leading to a strong preference for high-density housing, commonly known as apartments, which symbolizes middle-class housing [1][2][3][4]. Accordingly, the housing policy has been continuously transformed by the interlocking effects of the politico-economic and socio-demographic changes [2,5]. It is evident that the impact of the former was conspicuous during the periods of industrial growth and the effect of the latter became more pervasive in the post-industrial era.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the state is expected to be a super-aged society in 2025, and since 2020, it has already witnessed population decline, with the number of total population in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) surpassing that in non-SMA regions, deaths outpacing births, and dependent populations (children and elderly people) outnumbering the working-age population [7,8]. Although the official housing ratio, calculated by dividing the amount of housing stock by the number of households, was numerically realized in 2008, the number of households has been steadily escalating, and a dramatic increase in the number of one-and two-person households has still sustained the demand for housing [2,5,8]. As a non-traditional family arrangement, single-person households mostly consist of young adults or older adults [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation