2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing livelihoods and land reform: Evidence from the Northern Cape province of South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the speed of land redistribution is slower than intended. Secondly, land reform projects are failing to deliver on the promises of sustainable agricultural production for the generation of income, employment, food security, poverty alleviation and rural development (Hall, 2003;Bradstock, 2005;Kirsten and Machethe, 2005;Lahiff et al, 2012). However, it is difficult to track the progress of land reform over time and thus contribute to the larger debate on land reform issues regarding the optimal design of a land reform programme.…”
Section: South Africa's Land Reform Programme In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, the speed of land redistribution is slower than intended. Secondly, land reform projects are failing to deliver on the promises of sustainable agricultural production for the generation of income, employment, food security, poverty alleviation and rural development (Hall, 2003;Bradstock, 2005;Kirsten and Machethe, 2005;Lahiff et al, 2012). However, it is difficult to track the progress of land reform over time and thus contribute to the larger debate on land reform issues regarding the optimal design of a land reform programme.…”
Section: South Africa's Land Reform Programme In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that we know of are only once-off in nature, with no follow-up visits (e.g. Bradstock, 2005;AgriAfrica, 2005;Lahiff & Cousins, 2005). Consequently, the results of these studies are biased due to the once-off nature of the investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have shown that beneficiaries experience severe problems accessing services such as credit, training, extension advice, transport and ploughing services, veterinary services, and access to input and produce markets (HSRC 2003;Hall 2004;Bradstock 2005;Lahiff 2007). Other challenges include the types of beneficiaries accessing the programme, drawn out transfer periods, lack of transparency and possible illegitimate activities of local government institutions, the often inappropriate models of land-use being imposed on beneficiaries, the general failure of post-settlement support and, ultimately, the generally disappointing performance of land reform projects (Aliber and Mokoena, 2000;CASE, 2006).…”
Section: Problems With the Land Reform Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Zimbabwe, for example, initial land reform efforts included state support for the new farmers and their welfare improved, but as the support decreased, the livelihoods of resettled households shifted back to resemble other farmers in communal areas who had not benefited from land reform (Chimowu and Hulme, 2006). Similarly in Northern Cape province of South Africa, poor technical support and the risky nature of agriculture led to the land reforms having limited impact on reducing poverty (Bradstock, 2005).…”
Section: Market-led Land Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%