Changing manufacturing practices: An appraisal of the processual approach

Abstract

There has been a longstanding interest in human factors and the processes of change in manufacturing organizations. This paper focuses attention on the establishment and contribution of a processual perspective to understanding change. A history of the processual approach is outlined and some of the main defining elements and ongoing developments are appraised. Field data drawn from a study of cellular work arrangements at a mirror manufacturing plant is used to highlight the interlocking and overlapping dynamics between substance, context, and politics. In advocating the benefits of a processual perspective, it is argued that during the uptake of cellular manufacturing there is a mutual shaping between the 'technical' and the 'social' and in support of this claim, case study data are used to illustrate the complex and ongoing interaction between socio-political processes and the substance of change (in this case, the technical reconfiguration into cellular form). It is argued that attempts to distil, separate, identify and examine discrete elements (such as, technology) are misplaced and likely to produce misleading results that undervalue the importance of the contextual and socio-political processes that also play a key part as mutual shapers of change. ABSTRACTThere has been a longstanding interest in human factors and the processes of change in manufacturing organizations. This paper focuses attention on the establishment and contribution of a processual perspective to understanding change. A history of the processual approach is outlined and some of the main defining elements and ongoing developments are appraised. Field data drawn from a study of cellular work arrangements at a mirror manufacturing plant is used to highlight the interlocking and overlapping dynamics between substance, context, and politics. In advocating the benefits of a processual perspective, it is argued that during the uptake of cellular manufacturing there is a mutual shaping between the 'technical' and the 'social' and in support of this claim, case study data are used to illustrate the complex and ongoing interaction between socio-political processes and the substance of change (in this case, the technical reconfiguration into cellular form). It is argued that attempts to distil, separate, identify and examine discrete elements (such as, technology) are misplaced and likely to produce misleading results that undervalue the importance of the contextual and socio-political processes that also play a key part as mutual shapers of change. INTRODUCTIONThe main aim of this paper is to outline and appraise the contribution of the processual approach to understanding change in manufacturing organizations. An historical overview of 2 studies that have examined processes of change is provided and the contribution of the landmark work of Pettigrew (1985) is briefly reviewed. The central elements of the author's own proposed framework are then described and explained. For illustrative purposes, the paper uses data drawn from a study ...

Accounting for community building: the municipal amalgamation of Milan in 1873–1876

“…Moreover, the analysis of accounting change requires a conceptualisation of the ways in which new accounting practices evolve over time (Nelson and Winter 1982). To this end, we draw upon the processual approach of Dawson (2003Dawson ( , 2005Dawson ( , 2013Dawson ( , 2014 to better analyse the process of institutionalisation of accounting practices and the expectations before and after the change event.…”

The integration of human factors into a company's production design process

“…A framework is a set of non-linked constructs, whereas in a model the constructs are linked, and in theory, they are causally linked to explain how and why a phenomenon occurred. Numerous theoretical frameworks and models exist that describe the role of HF specialists in design of work systems, for example the soft system framework (Kirwan, 2000), the work compatibility improvement framework (Genaidy et al, 2009), the framework for social and organizational aspects of HF integration (Waterson and Kolose, 2010), the processural framework of change (Dawson, 2005) and other change management frameworks (Commissaris et al, 2006;Holden et al, 2008). Seim et al (2012) suggest that these frameworks, largely developed by academics, have been useful, but what is lacking is knowledge of "how" HF specialists can acquire the necessary capabilities and new work practices based on the models.…”

Associações entre características de organizações híbridas e elementos contextuais de resiliência organizacional

“…A perspectiva processual é útil para analisar tais processos, levando em consideração a complexidade do desenvolvimento da resiliência organizacional. Um modelo processual é profícuo para compreensão de fenômenos organizacionais relacionados à mudança, pois proporciona uma visão holística de tais fenômenos (Burnes, 2004;Pettigrew, Woodman, & Cameron, 2001;Dawson, 2005). Processos nessa abordagem referem-se à sequência de ações e relações que se desenvolvem no ambiente organizacional (Pettigrew et al, 2001).…”