2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra43993c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing molecular band offsets in polymer blends of (P3HT/P(VDF–TrFE)) poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(vinylidene fluoride with trifluoroethylene) due to ferroelectric poling

Abstract: Changing molecular band offsets in polymer blends of (P3HT/P(VDF-TrFE)) poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(vinylidene fluoride with trifluoroethylene) due to ferroelectric poling" (2013). Peter Dowben Publications. 249. Photoelectron emission and inverse photoemission spectroscopy studies of polymer blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride (70%)trifluoroethylene (30%)) P(VDF-TrFE 70 : 30) and regio-regular poly(3hexylthiophene) (P3HT) provide evidence of changes in the molecular band offsets as a result of changes in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(115 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the g -value of the broad component (2.0031) is more distant from g e (the g -value of the free electron: 2.0023) than that of the narrow component. This larger difference from g e is well explained by the heavy atom effect of spin–orbit coupling (SOC) by sulfur atoms in thiophene rings because the spin density on the sulfur atom is expected to be larger in the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) than that in the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in P3HT . We speculate that SOC on the sulfur atom could cause the greater difference from g e and the broadening of spectral line width.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Notably, the g -value of the broad component (2.0031) is more distant from g e (the g -value of the free electron: 2.0023) than that of the narrow component. This larger difference from g e is well explained by the heavy atom effect of spin–orbit coupling (SOC) by sulfur atoms in thiophene rings because the spin density on the sulfur atom is expected to be larger in the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) than that in the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in P3HT . We speculate that SOC on the sulfur atom could cause the greater difference from g e and the broadening of spectral line width.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The difference of g -factors for the hole and electron in P3HT has been recently reported with the density functional theory (DFT) calculation . The DFT calculations for P3HT indicate that the electron density on the sulfur atoms of the thiophene groups of the LUMO is greater than that on the sulfur atoms of the thiophenes of the HOMO. The nonvanishing electron density on the sulfur atoms associated with the LUMO results in the electron g -factor being larger than the hole g -factor. No clear EDMR spectrum was observed under dark conditions even at E = 1.17 × 10 5 V·cm –1 , where appreciable hole current (0.283 μA) flowed across the P3HT film (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because holes are transported through HOMOs, the relative orientation between the HOMOs of PT and perovskite as a result of different PT orientations becomes the key for solar cell performance. According to previously studied HOMOs of both P3HT and lead iodine-based perovskite, , they would overlap better with a lying down PT thiophene backbone orientation. Therefore, an edge-on thiophene backbone would lead to a greater offset of HOMO–HOMO between perovskite and PTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%